Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create SaaStr Landing Page with new DemoSetupPage component #24649

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 17, 2023

Conversation

grgia
Copy link
Contributor

@grgia grgia commented Aug 16, 2023

Details

Creates the landing page located at /saastr

I created a new component DemoSetupPage as outlined in the Design Doc and refactored the Sign In Page so we can pass in a custom headline for future conferences. This can be done in two files by changing login.hero.demoHeadline in en.js and es.js:

    login: {
        hero: {
            ...
            demoHeadline: 'YOUR CUSTOM HEADLINE HERE',
        },
    },

Desktop:
image

Mobile:
image

Spanish:
image

NOTE
For future Demos, we may want to make this modification to passing in the headerPath:
#24649 (comment)

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/308667

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

THIS IS A WEB-ONLY CHANGE

For Web and mWeb:

  • Go to the normal sign in page and follow sign in flow
  • Go to http://localhost:8082/saastr and follow sign in flow
    • ensure copy is correct on mobile and desktop
    • ensure user is signed in without error

For Native and Desktop:

  • Go to the normal sign in page and follow sign in flow, ensure user is signed in without error

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

For Web and mWeb:

  • Go to staging.new.expensify.com for staging or new.expensify.com for prod and follow sign in flow
    • ensure user is signed in without error
  • Go to staging.new.expensify.com/saastr for staging or new.expensify.com/saastr for prod and follow sign in flow
    • ensure copy is correct on mobile and desktop
    • ensure user is signed in without error

For Native and Desktop:

  • Go to staging.new.expensify.com for staging or new.expensify.com for prod and follow sign in flow
    • ensure user is signed in without error

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

Desktop:
image

Mobile:
image

Mobile Web - Chrome image
Mobile Web - Safari image
Desktop

N/A - Custom Route
image

iOS

N/A - Custom Route
image

Android

N/A - Custom Route

image

@grgia grgia self-assigned this Aug 16, 2023
@grgia grgia marked this pull request as ready for review August 16, 2023 21:43
@grgia grgia requested a review from a team as a code owner August 16, 2023 21:43
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team August 16, 2023 21:43
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 16, 2023

@s77rt Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from s77rt August 16, 2023 21:43
src/pages/signin/DemoSetupPage.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -9,10 +10,16 @@ import styles from '../../styles/styles';
import variables from '../../styles/variables';

const propTypes = {
/** Override the green headline copy */
customHeadline: PropTypes.string,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB. I think this should be headline or headlineText and marked as required.

The better alternative is to just make the default value props.translate('login.hero.header') but I don't think this is possible, we can't make the default value of one prop dependent on another prop.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@grgia grgia Aug 17, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

but I don't think this is possible, we can't make the default value of one prop dependent on another prop.

Yeah this was my thought as well- I agree it would be better as required and then just pass the headline function as an option to the react navigator stack
I think for now, we can leave this as is, as it'll only be used for conferences and creating custom sign in pages for events such as in this PR

Copy link
Contributor

@aldo-expensify aldo-expensify Aug 17, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB too, but if you wanted to do what @s77rt is suggesting, headline would receive the translation key and default to login.hero.header

When you use the component in the Demo page, you would pass the prop like:

<SignInPage customHeadline="login.hero.demoHeadline" />

instead of

<SignInPage customHeadline={translate('login.hero.demoHeadline')} />

but again, NAB, I don't feel like this is better or worse, just an alternative

PD:

                {props.customHeadline || props.translate('login.hero.header')}

would become

                {props.translate(props.headline)}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To be honest, I don't think that this change is worth blocking the PR since this is a critical issue

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll add a link to this comment in the description of this PR for the next time we update the demos?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good to me 👍

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Aug 16, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

web

Mobile Web - Chrome

mweb-chrome

Mobile Web - Safari

mweb-safari

Desktop

desktop

iOS

ios

Android

android

Co-authored-by: Abdelhafidh Belalia <16493223+s77rt@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@s77rt s77rt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! 🚀

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 17, 2023

@aldo-expensify Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 17, 2023

🎯 @s77rt, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #25396.

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor Author

grgia commented Aug 17, 2023

cc @Beamanator if you want to review for SaaStr project!

@aldo-expensify aldo-expensify merged commit 0d4dfef into main Aug 17, 2023
18 checks passed
@aldo-expensify aldo-expensify deleted the georgia-SaaStrLanding branch August 17, 2023 19:36
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

Innnnteresting, I didn't know we had a separate issue for this, I made my own version of this solution here - #24535

FYI we're going to have to do a very similar thing for SBE 😅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/aldo-expensify in version: 1.3.56-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.3.56-24 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants