[HOLD for payment 2024-09-27][Search v2.3] - Same saved search can be created at most twice

[IuliiaHerets]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: 9.0.35-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N/A - new feature, doesn't exist in prod
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): applausetester+kh010901@applause.expensifail.com
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team

Action Performed:

1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
2. Go to Search.
3. Click Filters.
4. Select Merchant and add search query (issue is reproducible with Merchant filter and not Date, Total filter).
5. Click Save search.
6. Click 3-dot menu next to the saved search > Rename.
7. Enter a custom name and save it.
8. Click Filters > Save search.
9. Note that it creates another saved search.
10. Rename the second saved search.
11. Go back to the first saved search.
12. Click Filters > Save search.
13. Note that it does not create a new search but changes the name of second saved search back to default.

Expected Result:

In Step 9, it will not create another same saved search because the filters are not modified.

Actual Result:

In Step 9, it creates another same saved search when the filters are not modified.

If Step 9 is the correct behavior, Step 13 shows a different result because user cannot create the same third saved from the first saved search as it changes the name of second saved search back to default.

This issue is not reproducible when Date and Total filter are used.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

• Android: Native
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Native
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Bug6603096_1726280498834.20240914_101401.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Issue Owner

Current Issue Owner: @OfstadC

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @OfstadC (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @pecanoro (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

[github-actions]

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
3. Fix the issue yourself.

[luacmartins]

This is coming from this PR. Gonna demote it to NAB, since it's not breaking any functionality. @lakchote we need to figure out why the hashes are different in this case.

[lakchote]

Not overdue. Awaiting payment.

[OfstadC]

Payment Summary

• @allroundexperts due $250 via Manual request in New Expensify

[melvin-bot]

Payment Summary

Upwork Job

• Reviewer: @allroundexperts owed $250 via NewDot

BugZero Checklist (@OfstadC)

• I have verified the correct assignees and roles are listed above and updated the neccesary manual offers
• I have verified that there are no duplicate or incorrect contracts on Upwork for this job (https://www.upwork.com/ab/applicants//hired)
• I have paid out the Upwork contracts or cancelled the ones that are incorrect
• I have verified the payment summary above is correct

[JmillsExpensify]

$250 approved for @allroundexperts