Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use EMODnetWFS as backbone of eurobis R package #86

Closed
salvafern opened this issue Mar 31, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Use EMODnetWFS as backbone of eurobis R package #86

salvafern opened this issue Mar 31, 2022 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@salvafern
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi all!

I am working a major update of the eurobis R package: lifewatch/eurobis#12. Despite of the name, this package uses the EMODnet-Biology webservices to access the eurobis occurrence data that flows to EMODnet-Biology.

At the moment, it seems more interesting for me to use ows4r than EMODnetWFS as there are a number of features that are present in ows4r that we need for this sort of package:

  • Filters with viewParams (unique of geoserver - not OGC)
  • Pagination
  • Parallelization

I will also appreciate caching, although this is not yet in ows4r.

I was wondering if you think it is useful to add these features to EMODnetWFS, or maybe we should rather keep this one simpler and use ows4r as backbone of eurobis?

@maelle
Copy link
Collaborator

maelle commented Apr 4, 2022

Naive question: should the package name be changed to clarify the intent?

@salvafern
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Naive question: should the package name be changed to clarify the intent?

Answered via email

@maelle
Copy link
Collaborator

maelle commented May 3, 2022

Would it make sense to open an issue for each of the specific features @salvafern?

@salvafern
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yes, would :) I'll open them when necessary. For now we can pass any params to ows4R (#87) so it is good enough for me. I'll close for now. Thanks @maelle @annakrystalli !

@maelle
Copy link
Collaborator

maelle commented May 3, 2022

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants