You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For LPI simulations, we would like a diagnostics that time-averages (over N subsequent steps) the output fields.
This is relatively easy to implement if we enforce the assumption that the output period P is greater than the averaging period N. For many simulations, that is sufficient and true.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@RevathiJambunathan because otherwise we will have run-away memory consumption (and more book keeping).
As an update, we clarified in the last meetings (AMP and KISMET) with the current sciences cases in our projects that this assumption works very well for everyone that requested this feature.
For LPI simulations, we would like a diagnostics that time-averages (over N subsequent steps) the output fields.
This is relatively easy to implement if we enforce the assumption that the output period P is greater than the averaging period N. For many simulations, that is sufficient and true.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: