-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrong Came Atomo button counter sequence during sending from Flipper #833
Comments
Hello! Can you share full RAW recording of the original remote so i can check btn counter? |
I'll send it later. The original remote is at my home now. |
There is RAW record from the original fob in attach. (.sub renamed to .txt) |
Thx, will work on that issue next days |
Yes, the issue is present, its possible to generate full sequence but it will take big buffer space and will require long button hold, since current implementation in subghz doesnt actually support sending different codes while holding a button, so for system like that - we generate full or partial sequence and put it all in buffer, while button is held it being transmitted as it was one code (but big one) |
I think third way is the best solution. |
Ill make some changes after release in next dev builds, and will ask you to test, thats fine? |
Shure. |
Describe the bug.
Version: Unleashed dev branch, commit 462ab25
During continuous sending Came Atomo, button counter changes from ~ 0x4Ch to 0x54h
Remote is working, gates opening but:
To program new remote to receiver with the old one, button counter should tick from 1 to 127 and begin from 0 with the same Pcl_Cnt. After this "zero-cross event" the receiver should switch to programming mode.
Reproduction
Select Menu => Sub-GHz => Saved => select any Came Atomo remote => Emulate
Hold central button to continuous send
Pcl_Cnt is static
Btn_Cnt is changing from ~ 0x4Ch to 0x54h (instead of changing from 0x0h to 0x7Fh and begin from 0x0h with the same Pcl_Cnt)
Target
No response
Logs
No response
Anything else?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: