Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature: create rows columns and value from structs and slice by custom tag #280

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Rennbon
Copy link

@Rennbon Rennbon commented Dec 7, 2021

It's easier to develop

@theodesp
Copy link
Collaborator

theodesp commented Dec 7, 2021

Hello @Rennbon. That is a great addition. I noticed that you add a new dependency for testing here. Do you think you can rewrite the test cases using the vanilla testing package only as I'm not sure if there is a need to change that at the moment?
@l3pp4rd do you agree?

@danpi
Copy link

danpi commented Dec 7, 2021 via email

@AlekSi
Copy link
Contributor

AlekSi commented Dec 7, 2021

I wonder why you ask me :)

Personally, I do use testify; but if this project does not use it yet and has the policy to avoid external testing libraries, I agree that introducing it there is not a good idea.

@theodesp
Copy link
Collaborator

theodesp commented Dec 7, 2021

I wonder why you ask me :)

Personally, I do use testify; but if this project does not use it yet and has the policy to avoid external testing libraries, I agree that introducing it there is not a good idea.

Hey @AlekSi Sorry I tagged you wrongly. Glad to get some feedback though.

@Rennbon
Copy link
Author

Rennbon commented Dec 7, 2021

That is a great addition. I noticed that you add a new dependency for testing here. Do you think you can rewrite the test cases using the vanilla testing package only as I'm not sure if there is a need to change that at the moment?
@l3pp4rd do you agree?

OK

@Rennbon Rennbon closed this Dec 7, 2021
@Rennbon Rennbon reopened this Dec 7, 2021
@Rennbon
Copy link
Author

Rennbon commented Dec 7, 2021

@theodesp I removed testify and used reflect.DeepEqual to verify that it was as expected.

@Rennbon Rennbon force-pushed the master branch 4 times, most recently from 2e690de to 94ed2f6 Compare December 8, 2021 03:24
Author:    Rennbon <343688972@qq.com>
Author:    Rennbon <343688972@qq.com>
rows.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rows_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
rows.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rows.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@theodesp
Copy link
Collaborator

@Rennbon Thank you. Will try to test it this week a bit more.

@Rennbon
Copy link
Author

Rennbon commented Dec 20, 2021

@Rennbon Thank you. Will try to test it this week a bit more.

Ok, hope to merge soon.

@Rennbon
Copy link
Author

Rennbon commented Feb 15, 2022

@theodesp Is there anything wrong with this PR

rows_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@theodesp
Copy link
Collaborator

@l3pp4rd Is there a way to add this PR in Travis CI/CD pipeline please. It seems that I'm not able to see the test results in order to merge. Thank you.

@dolmen
Copy link
Contributor

dolmen commented Apr 22, 2022

Those are utility functions. They don't have to be in the sqlmock core. They could be published as a separate package.

rows.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@Rennbon
Copy link
Author

Rennbon commented Apr 23, 2022

Those are utility functions. They don't have to be in the sqlmock core. They could be published as a separate package.

From a usage perspective, this commit reduces mock writing complexity.
If go-sqlmock implements this functionality directly, it will be easier for developers to use.

}
for i := 0; i < num; i++ {
f := val.Type().Field(i)
column := f.Tag.Get(tag)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code allows to use JSON tags, but doesn't fully support them.

Examples of incorrectly handled values: "-", "data,omitempty".

I think that using JSON tags is a bad default.

// NewRowsFromInterface new Rows from struct or slice or array reflect with tagName
// NOTE: arr/slice must be of the same type
// tagName default "json"
func NewRowsFromInterface(m interface{}, tagName string) (*Rows, error) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Go has generics now. It would be better to have multiple functions with stronger typing.

NewRowsFromSlice
NewRowsFromStruct

@Rennbon
Copy link
Author

Rennbon commented May 7, 2022

@dolmen 这个库是Go 1.15的,不是所有引用库都会升级到1.18的

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants