Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make Uint128 inner field private #946

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 14, 2021
Merged

Conversation

uint
Copy link
Contributor

@uint uint commented Jun 10, 2021

Closes #905

@uint uint requested a review from webmaster128 June 10, 2021 15:45
Copy link
Member

@webmaster128 webmaster128 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Just the update to ensure the CHANGELOG entry is at the right place.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@uint uint force-pushed the uint128-private-inner-value branch from 47d1ade to df039dd Compare June 14, 2021 09:59
@uint
Copy link
Contributor Author

uint commented Jun 14, 2021

Rebased!

Copy link
Member

@webmaster128 webmaster128 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Just the merge conflict and running the markdown text formatter.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
- cosmwasm-std: Fix `Uint64::multiply_ratio` and `Uint128::multiply_ratio` so
that internal multiplication cannot cause an unnecessary overflow. ([#920])
- cosmwasm-std: Fix `Uint64::multiply_ratio` and `Uint128::multiply_ratio`
so that internal multiplication cannot cause an unnecessary overflow. ([#920])
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This "so" was moved up by my because of the text formatter (See ./devtools/format_md.sh and #951)

@uint
Copy link
Contributor Author

uint commented Jun 14, 2021

LGTM. Just the merge conflict and running the markdown text formatter.

Want to merge #945 first? I think it will cause another conflict.

@webmaster128 webmaster128 merged commit ce8ce0c into main Jun 14, 2021
@webmaster128 webmaster128 deleted the uint128-private-inner-value branch June 14, 2021 11:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make Uint128 inner value private
2 participants