Skip to content

Commit 4f76426

Browse files
committed
citation and tables
1 parent 1a63d69 commit 4f76426

File tree

3 files changed

+22
-22
lines changed

3 files changed

+22
-22
lines changed

thesis/NetworkImplemenation.tex

+1-1
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ \subsubsection{Phase Detector}
324324
As previously mentioned, the time-to-digital conversion is carried out by a tapped delay line. As with the \ac{RO}, inverters will be used to provide the delay between each tap, and thus the resolution of the \ac{TDL} and the length of each individual delay is based on the layout chosen by the router in Vivado. Due to this, the exact resolution of the phase detector is unknown, although the delay through inverters used in Vivado simulations, and the average delay computed based on \ac{RO} centre frequencies, can be used to estimate that of the phase detectors. Based these figures for the the propagation delay due to an inverter, $\tau_{inv}$ can be estimated to be in the region of $300~\si{\pico\second}$. As each tap consists of an inverter pair, the delay through the tap, $\tau_{tap} \approx 600~\si{\pico\second}$. Characterisation of the \ac{TDL}, through measurement of the delays steps in each \ac{TDL}, is technically possible, however, this is an time consuming process as many \acp{TDL} would need to be characterised in order to accurately compute the average delay.
325325

326326
%TODO eugene
327-
The delay line itself is shown in Figure \ref{fig:tdl_impl}, with each tap implemented by a pair of flip-flops and three inverters. For an $N$ bit width phase error detection, $2^{N-1}-1$ taps are required. In the case of this \ac{ADPLL}, a 5 bit two's complement error signal is required, thus the range of the signal is $[-16,15]\cap\mathbb{Z}$. If the range is made symmetrical, 15 taps are required to fill a signal of this size. From the diagram, it can be seen that unless edges are detected on each signal at exactly the same instant, it is almost impossible to measure a zero phase difference between reference and generated signals. This is an intentional decision, \cite{idkwhattocite}.
327+
The delay line itself is shown in Figure \ref{fig:tdl_impl}, with each tap implemented by a pair of flip-flops and three inverters. For an $N$ bit width phase error detection, $2^{N-1}-1$ taps are required. In the case of this \ac{ADPLL}, a 5 bit two's complement error signal is required, thus the range of the signal is $[-16,15]\cap\mathbb{Z}$. If the range is made symmetrical, 15 taps are required to fill a signal of this size. From the diagram, it can be seen that unless edges are detected on each signal at exactly the same instant, it is almost impossible to measure a zero phase difference between reference and generated signals. This is done to maximize the information carried by the digital signal \cite{shan2014phd}.
328328
\begin{figure}[h]
329329
\centering
330330
\includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{../new_pdet2}

thesis/TestingAnalysis.tex

+21-21
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -28,9 +28,9 @@ \section{2x2 Network Performance Comparison}
2828
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Bi-dir.} &1.9964 &1.9146 &1.9572 &15.089 &18.283 &19.673 &9.2449 &11.612 &12.052 \T\\
2929
\hline
3030
\multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\ac{ADPLL} Design 2}&-&-&-&-&-&-&-&-&-\T\\
31-
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Free PLLs} &0.56222 &0.49224 &0.64124 &5.3039 &7.8626 &5.4634 &&& \T\\
32-
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Uni-dir.} &0.55040 &0.51284 &0.62796 &5.5312 &7.5359 &7.9697 &&& \T\\
33-
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Bi-dir.} &0.57056 &0.50403 &0.61644 &11.515 &15.943 &17.428 &&& \T\\
31+
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Free PLLs} &0.66275 &0.62108 &0.63211 &5.7432 &5.4399 &5.2317 &0.00768 &-0.1681 &0.5383 \T\\
32+
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Uni-dir.} &0.65990 &0.63995 &0.67278 &5.6926 &6.9422 &8.9609 &0.00663 &-0.3453 &0.76741 \T\\
33+
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Bi-dir.} &0.66308 &0.66233 &0.67583 &12.222 &16.719 &19.176 &5.0799 & 7.2752 &8.7174 \T\\
3434
\hline
3535
\multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\ac{ADPLL} Design 3}&-&-&-&-&-&-&-&-&-\T\\
3636
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Free PLLs} &0.66757 &0.84477 &0.71308 &5.9142 &6.1353 &5.3939 &-0.36997 &-0.20981 &-1.3344 \T\\
@@ -47,13 +47,13 @@ \section{2x2 Network Performance Comparison}
4747
\end{table}
4848
%\FloatBarrier
4949
%%design2
50-
%&6.6275e-10&6.2108e-10&6.3211e-10&5.7432e-09&5.4399e-09&5.2317e-09&7.6801e-12&-1.6812e-10&5.383e-10
51-
%&6.599e-10&6.3995e-10&6.7278e-10&5.6926e-09&6.9422e-09&8.9609e-09&6.6269e-12&-3.4538e-10&7.6741e-10
52-
%&6.6308e-10&6.6233e-10&6.7583e-10&1.2222e-08&1.6719e-08&1.9176e-08&5.0799e-09&7.2752e-09&8.7174e-09
50+
%&0.66275 &0.62108 &0.63211 &5.7432 &5.4399 &5.2317 &0.00768 &-0.1681 &0.5383
51+
%&0.65990 &0.63995 &0.67278 &5.6926 &6.9422 &8.9609 &0.00663 &-0.3453 &0.76741
52+
%&0.66308 &0.66233 &0.67583 &12.222 &16.719 &19.176 &5.0799 & 7.2752 &8.7174
5353
%%design3
54-
%&7.2836e-10&5.1636e-10&6.8017e-10&4.3727e-08&4.3404e-08&4.3e-08&3.9592e-08&3.917e-08&3.984e-08
55-
%&7.2557e-10&5.5049e-10&7.3112e-10&2.6007e-08&2.6133e-08&2.7422e-08&2.1748e-08&2.1524e-08&2.3061e-08
56-
%&7.1964e-10&5.5383e-10&7.2937e-10&2.0045e-08&2.062e-08&2.2781e-08&1.5676e-08&1.5781e-08&1.775e-08
54+
%&0.72836 &0.51636 &0.68017 &4.3727e-08 &4.3404e-08 &4.3e-08 &3.9592e-08 &3.917 e-08 &3.984e-08
55+
%&0.72557 &0.55049 &0.73112 &2.6007e-08 &2.6133e-08 &2.7422e-08 &2.1748e-08 &2.1524e-08 &2.3061e-08
56+
%&0.71964 &0.55383 &0.72937 &2.0045e-08 &2.062e-08 &2.2781e-08 &1.5676e-08 &1.5781e-08 &1.775e-08
5757

5858

5959
\section{3x3 Network Performance Comparison}
@@ -74,19 +74,19 @@ \section{3x3 Network Performance Comparison}
7474
&&PLL 11&PLL 22&PLL 33 &PLL 11&PLL 22&PLL 33 &PLL 11&PLL 22&PLL 33 \T\\
7575
\hline
7676
\multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\ac{ADPLL} Design 1}&-&-&-&-&-&-&-&-&-\T\\
77-
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Free PLLs} &&& &&& &&& \T\\
78-
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Uni-dir.} &&& &&& &&& \T\\
79-
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Bi-dir.} &&& &&& &&& \T\\
77+
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Free PLLs} &1.8956 &1.8425 &1.7594 &5.7868 &5.8407 &6.2537 &1.8481 &1.5976 &2.3251 \T\\
78+
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Uni-dir.} &1.7836 &1.8206 &1.8827 &5.5863 &6.522 &9.4008 &1.7697 &1.0359 &1.5503 \T\\
79+
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Bi-dir.} &1.9049 &1.9205 &1.9441 &22.980 &42.771 &47.441 &17.268 &33.739 &35.989 \T\\
8080
\hline
8181
\multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\ac{ADPLL} Design 2}&-&-&-&-&-&-&-&-&-\T\\
82-
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Free PLLs} &0.47167 &0.55012 &0.36251 &5.9649 &6.6965 &5.5010 &3.4045&3.2369&2.3108 \T\\
83-
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Uni-dir.} &0.49292 &0.55586 &0.39054 &5.958 &8.9250 &11.622 &3.5052&6.9860&8.874 \T\\
84-
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Bi-dir.} &0.43263 &0.48053 &0.33778 &18.867 &35.973 &38.773 &15.193&28.965&30.841 \T\\
82+
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Free PLLs} &0.47167 &0.55012 &0.36251 &5.9649 &6.6965 &5.5010 &3.4045&3.2369&2.3108 \T\\
83+
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Uni-dir.} &0.49292 &0.55586 &0.39054 &5.958 &8.9250 &11.622 &3.5052&6.9860&8.874 \T\\
84+
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Bi-dir.} &0.43263 &0.48053 &0.33778 &18.867 &35.973 &38.773 &15.193&28.965&30.841 \T\\
8585
\hline
8686
\multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\ac{ADPLL} Design 3}&-&-&-&-&-&-&-&-&-\T\\
87-
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Free PLLs} &0.89042 &0.64889 &0.57405 &4.0634 &3.2467 &2.3141 &1.8373&1.1006&0.39334 \T\\
88-
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Uni-dir.} &0.93580 &0.93353 &0.71361 &4.2675 &5.8193 &6.4139 &1.8605&2.3172&3.1463 \T\\
89-
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Bi-dir.} &0.97717 &0.85131 &0.63863 &5.6439 &8.4856 &9.4467 &2.7129&4.1074&5.1717 \T\\
87+
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Free PLLs} &0.89042 &0.64889 &0.57405 &4.0634 &3.2467 &2.3141 &1.8373&1.1006&0.39334 \T\\
88+
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Uni-dir.} &0.93580 &0.93353 &0.71361 &4.2675 &5.8193 &6.4139 &1.8605&2.3172&3.1463 \T\\
89+
\multicolumn{2}{|r|}{Bi-dir.} &0.97717 &0.85131 &0.63863 &5.6439 &8.4856 &9.4467 &2.7129&4.1074&5.1717 \T\\
9090
\hline
9191
\B
9292
\end{tabular}
@@ -98,9 +98,9 @@ \section{3x3 Network Performance Comparison}
9898
\end{table}
9999
%\FloatBarrier
100100

101-
%&1.8956e-09&1.8425e-09&1.7594e-09&5.7868e-09&5.8407e-09&6.2537e-09&1.8481e-09&1.5976e-09&2.3251e-09
102-
%&1.7836e-09&1.8206e-09&1.8827e-09&5.5863e-09&6.522e-09&9.4008e-09&1.7697e-09&1.0359e-09&1.5503e-09
103-
%&1.9049e-09&1.9205e-09&1.9441e-09&2.298e-08&4.2771e-08&4.7441e-08&1.7268e-08&3.3739e-08&3.5989e-08
101+
%&1.8956 &1.8425 &1.7594 &5.7868 &5.8407 &6.2537 &1.8481 &1.5976 &2.3251
102+
%&1.7836 &1.8206 &1.8827 &5.5863 &6.522 &9.4008 &1.7697 &1.0359 &1.5503
103+
%&1.9049 &1.9205 &1.9441 &22.980 &42.771 &47.441 &17.268 &33.739 &35.989
104104

105105
\section{Minor Variations}\label{section:minor_variations}
106106
A number of minor design decisions will be tested in this section against their alternatives, as will the impact of varying the \ac{LF} gains.

thesis/Thesis.pdf

328 KB
Binary file not shown.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)