Transducer and related terms #908
APCox
started this conversation in
Ontology Terms and Class Schema
Replies: 3 comments
|
Also, maybe, |
0 replies
|
Alongside
|
0 replies
|
Yes, it does seem that Transducer should be moved under Material Entity, since things other than artifacts can convert energy from one form to another. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Determine whether to move
Transducerunder material entity (see, for example, #848 ) or keep it in its current place in the hierarchy and make its status as a type of Material Artifact more explicit.Add
Transduction Processand eitherTransduction DispositionorTransduction Artifact Functionas appropriate and use these to defineTransducer.All reactions