Ensure binary identical restart files when using EAP

[TillRasmussen]

For detailed information about submitting Pull Requests (PRs) to the CICE-Consortium,
please refer to: https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/About-Us/wiki/Resource-Index#information-for-developers

PR checklist

• Short (1 sentence) summary of your PR:
  Set a11_1, a11_2, a11_3, a11_4 to zero on all land points. This ensure bfb when runing baseline. test
  If not set to zero this will differ from the restart dump of masked blocks.

• Developer(s):
  @TillRasmussen

• Suggest PR reviewers from list in the column to the right.

• @eclare108213 @apcraig

• Please copy the PR test results link or provide a summary of testing completed below.
  Following test was run
  ./cice.setup --suite first_suite,base_suite,travis_suite,decomp_suite,reprosum_suite,quick_suite --mach freya --env intel,gnu --testid baseeap3 --bgen baseeap3
  All test was forced to run with eap.
  With the following result
  #totl = 1192 total
  #chkd = 1192 checked
  #pass = 1173
  #pend = 14
  #miss = 5
  #fail = 0
  #failbuild = 0
  #failrun = 0
  #failtest = 0
  #failcomp = 0
  #failbfbc = 0
  #failgen = 0

• How much do the PR code changes differ from the unmodified code?

  • bit for bit
  • [] different at roundoff level
  • more substantial
  • [ x] Not bit for bit but only changes landpoint, thus no influence on results

• Does this PR create or have dependencies on Icepack or any other models?

  • Yes
  • [x ] No

• Does this PR add any new test cases?

  • Yes
  • [ x] No

• Is the documentation being updated? ("Documentation" includes information on the wiki or in the .rst files from doc/source/, which are used to create the online technical docs at https://readthedocs.org/projects/cice-consortium-cice/. A test build of the technical docs will be performed as part of the PR testing.)

  • Yes
  • [x ] No, does the documentation need to be updated at a later time?
    • Yes
    • [x ] No

• Please provide any additional information or relevant details below: