Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem: No overview on how gitbloq is intended to work #13

Closed
samuelralak opened this issue Jun 24, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Problem: No overview on how gitbloq is intended to work #13

samuelralak opened this issue Jun 24, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@samuelralak
Copy link
Member

Problem: There's no overview on how gitbloq is intended to work. This is needed as it should work as guide/direction in creating future issues

Solution: Ask @gazhayes to provide a brief yet comprehensive description of the Project - C4 style, possibly include it in README.md

cc: @gazhayes

@samuelralak samuelralak added the question Further information is requested label Jun 24, 2019
@gsovereignty
Copy link
Member

It's basically impossible to compare different blockchain projects' github activity at the moment. You have to manually search and see how active the community around the project really is. It's easy to see how active the main repo is, but not the community in general (using/building the related infrastructure and libraries etc).

So the idea with gitbloq is to harvest all meaningful data through the github API (and probably some scraping too since the API is a bit limited in terms of what data it can provide), and display it in a large variety of ways, maybe give users the ability to contrast and compare different aspects etc.

As with all C4 projects, we're really just starting with a problem and seeing what happens, so that obviously limits how much we can predict what this will end up looking like, but I think that probably gives you a pretty good idea (does it?)

@samuelralak
Copy link
Member Author

samuelralak commented Jun 24, 2019

@gazhayes yes sir, that's perfect

@samuelralak samuelralak pinned this issue Jun 24, 2019
@gsovereignty gsovereignty unpinned this issue Jun 27, 2019
@gsovereignty gsovereignty pinned this issue Jun 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants