Skip to content

Conversation

@affonsov
Copy link

@affonsov affonsov commented Jan 4, 2024

Rationale for this change

CMAKE build results were being swallowed after the cd ..
Now the result is captured and returned later

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?

Are there any user-facing changes?

alinaliBQ
alinaliBQ previously approved these changes Jan 4, 2024
Copy link

@alinaliBQ alinaliBQ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! (Please do not merge the PR, we can just leave it open)

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 4, 2024

Thanks for opening a pull request!

If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on GitHub? https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/new/choose

Opening GitHub issues ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project.

Then could you also rename the pull request title in the following format?

GH-${GITHUB_ISSUE_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

or

MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

In the case of PARQUET issues on JIRA the title also supports:

PARQUET-${JIRA_ISSUE_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@affonsov affonsov force-pushed the affonsov/fix-github-action-not-failing-on-build branch from 9494c65 to 2fd7a18 Compare January 5, 2024 18:54
@affonsov affonsov changed the base branch from GAC-odbc-driver to alinaliBQ/GAC-39/update-arrow-ver-flightsql-odbc January 5, 2024 19:11
@affonsov affonsov force-pushed the affonsov/fix-github-action-not-failing-on-build branch 2 times, most recently from f491591 to 927f222 Compare January 5, 2024 21:24
@alinaliBQ alinaliBQ force-pushed the alinaliBQ/GAC-39/update-arrow-ver-flightsql-odbc branch from 5c03e97 to e6ba2c8 Compare January 5, 2024 22:32
Copy link

@alinaliBQ alinaliBQ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good PR. I see that the workflow fails properly when the build fails. I just have 2 minor comments. Will take another look when the test code in main.cc is removed.

@affonsov affonsov force-pushed the affonsov/fix-github-action-not-failing-on-build branch from 927f222 to 06ce06b Compare January 5, 2024 23:24
Copy link

@alinaliBQ alinaliBQ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

alinaliBQ pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2025
…n timezone (apache#45051)

### Rationale for this change

If the timezone database is present on the system, but does not contain a timezone referenced in a ORC file, the ORC reader will crash with an uncaught C++ exception.

This can happen for example on Ubuntu 24.04 where some timezone aliases have been removed from the main `tzdata` package to a `tzdata-legacy` package. If `tzdata-legacy` is not installed, trying to read a ORC file that references e.g. the "US/Pacific" timezone would crash.

Here is a backtrace excerpt:
```
#12 0x00007f1a3ce23a55 in std::terminate() () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#13 0x00007f1a3ce39391 in __cxa_throw () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#14 0x00007f1a3f4accc4 in orc::loadTZDB(std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) ()
   from /tmp/arrow-HEAD.ArqTs/venv-wheel-3.12-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pyarrow/libarrow.so.1900
#15 0x00007f1a3f4ad392 in std::call_once<orc::LazyTimezone::getImpl() const::{lambda()#1}>(std::once_flag&, orc::LazyTimezone::getImpl() const::{lambda()#1}&&)::{lambda()#2}::_FUN() () from /tmp/arrow-HEAD.ArqTs/venv-wheel-3.12-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pyarrow/libarrow.so.1900
#16 0x00007f1a4298bec3 in __pthread_once_slow (once_control=0xa5ca7c8, init_routine=0x7f1a3ce69420 <__once_proxy>) at ./nptl/pthread_once.c:116
#17 0x00007f1a3f4a9ad0 in orc::LazyTimezone::getEpoch() const ()
   from /tmp/arrow-HEAD.ArqTs/venv-wheel-3.12-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pyarrow/libarrow.so.1900
#18 0x00007f1a3f4e76b1 in orc::TimestampColumnReader::TimestampColumnReader(orc::Type const&, orc::StripeStreams&, bool) ()
   from /tmp/arrow-HEAD.ArqTs/venv-wheel-3.12-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pyarrow/libarrow.so.1900
#19 0x00007f1a3f4e84ad in orc::buildReader(orc::Type const&, orc::StripeStreams&, bool, bool, bool) ()
   from /tmp/arrow-HEAD.ArqTs/venv-wheel-3.12-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pyarrow/libarrow.so.1900
#20 0x00007f1a3f4e8dd7 in orc::StructColumnReader::StructColumnReader(orc::Type const&, orc::StripeStreams&, bool, bool) ()
   from /tmp/arrow-HEAD.ArqTs/venv-wheel-3.12-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pyarrow/libarrow.so.1900
#21 0x00007f1a3f4e8532 in orc::buildReader(orc::Type const&, orc::StripeStreams&, bool, bool, bool) ()
   from /tmp/arrow-HEAD.ArqTs/venv-wheel-3.12-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pyarrow/libarrow.so.1900
#22 0x00007f1a3f4925e9 in orc::RowReaderImpl::startNextStripe() ()
   from /tmp/arrow-HEAD.ArqTs/venv-wheel-3.12-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pyarrow/libarrow.so.1900
#23 0x00007f1a3f492c9d in orc::RowReaderImpl::next(orc::ColumnVectorBatch&) ()
   from /tmp/arrow-HEAD.ArqTs/venv-wheel-3.12-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pyarrow/libarrow.so.1900
#24 0x00007f1a3e6b251f in arrow::adapters::orc::ORCFileReader::Impl::ReadBatch(orc::RowReaderOptions const&, std::shared_ptr<arrow::Schema> const&, long) ()
   from /tmp/arrow-HEAD.ArqTs/venv-wheel-3.12-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pyarrow/libarrow.so.1900
```

### What changes are included in this PR?

Catch C++ exceptions when iterating ORC batches instead of letting them slip through.

### Are these changes tested?

Yes.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No.
* GitHub Issue: apache#40633

Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
@alinaliBQ alinaliBQ deleted the branch alinaliBQ/GAC-39/update-arrow-ver-flightsql-odbc April 14, 2025 22:27
@alinaliBQ alinaliBQ closed this Apr 14, 2025
@alinaliBQ alinaliBQ deleted the affonsov/fix-github-action-not-failing-on-build branch May 22, 2025 21:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants