Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Linked to PR# 1045] Adding support for encryption key type #8035

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2020

Conversation

HimanshuChhabra
Copy link
Member

…ices for table and queue)

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 26, 2019

azure-sdk-for-js - Release

️✔️ succeeded [Logs] [Expand Details]
  • ️✔️ Generate from 1998d0a with merge commit ab39a93. SDK Automation 13.0.17.20191226.1
  • ️✔️@azure/arm-storage [Logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    [npmPack] npm WARN deprecated rollup-plugin-node-resolve@5.2.0: This package has been deprecated and is no longer maintained. Please use @rollup/plugin-node-resolve.
    [npmPack] loaded rollup.config.js with warnings
    [npmPack] (!) Unused external imports
    [npmPack] default imported from external module 'rollup' but never used
    [npmPack] 
    [npmPack] ./esm/storageManagementClient.js → ./dist/arm-storage.js...
    [npmPack] created ./dist/arm-storage.js in 554ms

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 26, 2019

azure-sdk-for-java - Release

⚠️ warning [Logs] [Expand Details]

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 26, 2019

azure-sdk-for-go - Release

️✔️ succeeded [Logs] [Expand Details]

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 26, 2019

azure-sdk-for-net - Release

️✔️ succeeded [Logs] [Expand Details]

@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Dec 26, 2019

azure-sdk-for-python - Release

️✔️ succeeded [Logs] [Expand Details]
  • ️✔️ Generate from 1998d0a with merge commit ab39a93. SDK Automation 13.0.17.20191226.1
  • ️✔️azure-mgmt-storage [Logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    [after_scripts|python] WARNING:__main__:Found too much API version: {'2018-03-01-preview', '2018-07-01'} in label v2018_07_01
    [after_scripts|python] WARNING:__main__:Guessing you want 2018-07-01 based on label v2018_07_01
    [build_package] /usr/lib/python3.6/distutils/dist.py:261: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'long_description_content_type'
    [build_package]   warnings.warn(msg)
    [build_package] /usr/lib/python3.6/distutils/dist.py:261: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'long_description_content_type'
    [build_package]   warnings.warn(msg)

@erich-wang erich-wang added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Dec 27, 2019
@erich-wang
Copy link
Member

@HimanshuChhabra, could you let us know why do you add Do Not Merge in title?

@HimanshuChhabra
Copy link
Member Author

@HimanshuChhabra, could you let us know why do you add Do Not Merge in title?

@erich-wang the server side is currently deploying across regions and thus we want to pause the merge for now.

@HimanshuChhabra
Copy link
Member Author

@erich-wang This PR was already approved in private repo# 1045

@anthony-c-martin anthony-c-martin added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Jan 6, 2020
@anthony-c-martin
Copy link
Member

@erich-wang This PR was already approved in private repo# 1045

Signed off for ARM as this has already been signed off in private

@erich-wang
Copy link
Member

@HimanshuChhabra, please remove Do Not Merge from title when this is PR is ready for merge.

@erich-wang erich-wang added the DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval label Jan 7, 2020
@HimanshuChhabra
Copy link
Member Author

@HimanshuChhabra, please remove Do Not Merge from title when this is PR is ready for merge.

Yes, I will. Thank you

@HimanshuChhabra HimanshuChhabra changed the title [Do Not Merge] [Linked to PR# 1045] Adding support for encryption key type [Linked to PR# 1045] Adding support for encryption key type Jan 9, 2020
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@HimanshuChhabra
Copy link
Member Author

HimanshuChhabra commented Jan 9, 2020

@erich-wang\ @anthony-c-martin Kindly Initiate Merge for this PR. Thank you.

@blueww blueww removed the DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval label Jan 9, 2020
@erich-wang erich-wang merged commit ab39a93 into Azure:master Jan 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants