[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.ContainerService/aks to add version preview/2023-07-02-preview #25254
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…eview/2023-06-02-preview to version 2023-07-02-preview
* add new field resourceUID to managed cluster properties https://msazure.visualstudio.com/CloudNativeCompute/_git/aks-rp/pullrequest/8416789 * update description
* Mark guardrailsProfile Version as not required * Run prettier --------- Co-authored-by: Nick Keller <nickkeller@nickmsftlaptop.lan>
* added web app routing changes for multiple dns zones * modified examples
…#25063) * Changes for unified azuremonitorprofile * Update prettier changes * Update specification/containerservice/resource-manager/Microsoft.ContainerService/aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json Co-authored-by: FumingZhang <81607949+FumingZhang@users.noreply.github.com> * Update specification/containerservice/resource-manager/Microsoft.ContainerService/aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json Co-authored-by: FumingZhang <81607949+FumingZhang@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Janvi Jatakia (from Dev Box) <jajataki@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: FumingZhang <81607949+FumingZhang@users.noreply.github.com>
#25099) * update preview API to follow GA api - use one forceupgrade boolean instead of multiple overrides * update msg --------- Co-authored-by: Wenjun Gao <wenjungao@microsoft.com>
…25112) * Mark trusted access role binding PUT and DELETE operation as async * fix CI: update TA oepration's error to common type error
* Swagger for Machine List, Get API Related work items: #24759018 * Update managedClusters.json * Update managedClusters.json * Update MachineGet.json adding new line * Update MachineList.json * Update managedClusters.json * Update managedClusters.json * Update managedClusters.json * swagger: machine api * swagger: machine api * swagger:machine api * swagger: machine api * swagger: machine api * swagger: machine api * Update specification/containerservice/resource-manager/Microsoft.ContainerService/aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json Co-authored-by: FumingZhang <81607949+FumingZhang@users.noreply.github.com> * swagger: machine api * swagger: machine api * swagger: machine api * swagger:machine api * swagger:machine api * swagger:machine api --------- Co-authored-by: FumingZhang <81607949+FumingZhang@users.noreply.github.com>
* Adding Guardrails version to public swagger * renamed GetGuardrailsVersions.json * Applied GetCollectionResponseSchema rule * Ran prettier fix * Minor change * moving parametre into managedClusters.json * GuardrailsAvailableVersion model change * Updated version param reference * Swagger SemanticValidation fix * model changes * prettier fix * Added version in list response * Changed to resource in GET and added descriptions where needed * Removed identifier in GuardrailsAvailableVersionsList --------- Co-authored-by: Sindhuja Salla <sisalla@microsoft.com>
* remove unused properties * only remove from required section * remove the whole properties --------- Co-authored-by: zhifanhui <zhifanhui@microsoft.com>
FumingZhang
requested review from
msyyc,
palma21,
weinong,
alvinli222,
matthchr and
circy9
as code owners
|
Hi, @FumingZhang! Thank you for your pull request. To help get your PR merged: Generated ApiView comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff. |
Swagger Validation Report
|
| compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] | new version | base version |
|---|---|---|
| managedClusters.json | 2023-07-02-preview(8ed8c3a) | 2023-07-01(main) |
| managedClusters.json | 2023-07-02-preview(8ed8c3a) | 2023-06-02-preview(main) |
The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest stable version:
The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest preview version:
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️⚠️LintDiff: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
| compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.1.4) | new version | base version |
|---|---|---|
| package-preview-2023-07 | package-preview-2023-07(8ed8c3a) | default(main) |
[must fix]The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:
| Rule | Message | Related RPC [For API reviewers] |
|---|---|---|
| The response of operation:'Machines_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1385 |
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
|
The private endpoint model 'PrivateLinkResourcesListResult' schema does not conform to the common type definition. Location: aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L2153 |
| Based on the response model schema, operation 'ManagedClusters_ListKubernetesVersions' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. Location: aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L116 |
|
| OperationId should contain the verb: 'listcredential' in:'ManagedClusters_GetAccessProfile'. Consider updating the operationId Location: aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L284 |
|
| Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: Get Managed Cluster Location: aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L367 |
|
| Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: Get Managed Cluster Location: aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L415 |
|
| Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: Get Managed Cluster Location: aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L460 |
|
| Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: Get Managed Cluster Location: aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L502 |
|
| The response of operation:'AgentPools_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1072 |
|
| The response of operation:'AgentPools_CreateOrUpdate' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1115 |
|
| Based on the response model schema, operation 'PrivateEndpointConnections_List' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. Location: aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1869 |
|
| The response of operation:'PrivateEndpointConnections_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1912 |
|
| The response of operation:'PrivateEndpointConnections_Update' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1960 |
|
| Based on the response model schema, operation 'PrivateLinkResources_List' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. Location: aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L2131 |
|
| OperationId should contain the verb: 'resolveprivatelinkserviceid' in:'ResolvePrivateLinkServiceId_POST'. Consider updating the operationId Location: aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L2178 |
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
️️✔️Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
Generated ApiView
|
AzureRestAPISpecReview
added
ARMChangesRequested
FumingZhang
removed
the
ARMChangesRequested
openapi-workflow-bot
bot
added
the
WaitForARMFeedback
ms-henglu
reviewed
Aug 21, 2023
...ource-manager/Microsoft.ContainerService/aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
ms-henglu
reviewed
Aug 21, 2023
...ource-manager/Microsoft.ContainerService/aks/preview/2023-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
ms-henglu
requested changes
Aug 21, 2023
ms-henglu
added
the
ARMChangesRequested
openapi-workflow-bot
bot
removed
the
WaitForARMFeedback
Next Steps to Merge |
…preview (#25433) * adding requested properties. * adding requested properties * prettier check * removing read-only constraint
|
Automatic PR validation started. This comment will be populated with next steps to merge this PR once validation is completed. Please wait ⌛. |
FumingZhang
removed
the
ARMChangesRequested
openapi-workflow-bot
bot
added
the
WaitForARMFeedback
ms-henglu
added
the
ARMSignedOff
openapi-workflow-bot
bot
removed
the
WaitForARMFeedback
|
/pr RequestMerge |
ms-henglu
approved these changes
Aug 22, 2023
ms-henglu
deleted the
FumingZhang-containerservice-Microsoft.ContainerService-2023-07-02-preview
branch
|
Swagger pipeline restarted successfully, please wait for status update in this comment. |
This was referenced Aug 17, 2023
Merged
3 tasks
6 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.
ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request
PR review workflow diagram
Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.
[1] public repo review queue, private repo review queue
The PRs are processed by time opened, ascending. Your PR may show up on 2nd or later page.
If you addressed Step 1 from the diagram and your PR is not showing up in the queue, ensure the label
ARMChangesRequestedis removed from your PR. This should cause the label
WaitForARMFeedbackto be added.[2] https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel
[3] List of SDK breaking changes approvers in pinned Teams announcement
[4] public repo merge queue, private repo merge queue
If you need further help with anything, see
Getting helpsection below.Purpose of this PR
What's the purpose of this PR? Check all that apply. This is mandatory!
Due diligence checklist
To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:
ARM resource provider contract and
REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
I understand this is required before I can proceed to Step 2, "ARM Review", for this PR.
Breaking changes review (Step 1)
you must follow the breaking changes process.
IMPORTANT This applies even if:
Such claims must be reviewed, and the process is the same.
ARM API changes review (Step 2)
ARMReviewlabel.Getting help
and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.