Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Swagger specs for ARE[Azure Runtime Environment] #23988

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Nov 2, 2023

Conversation

sushil490023
Copy link
Contributor

@sushil490023 sushil490023 commented May 15, 2023

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?

    • new service onboarding
    • [ X] new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
    June 2023

  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
    June 2023

  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Al supported SDKs will be updated for new API version

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • [ X] Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @sushil490023 Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 15, 2023

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] new version base version
    definitions.json 2018-06-10(6dbea55) 2018-06-10(main)
    ️🔄Breaking Change(Cross-Version) inProgress [Detail]
    ️⌛CredScan pending [Detail]
    ️🔄LintDiff inProgress [Detail]
    ️❌Avocado: 7 Errors, 1 Warnings failed [Detail]
    Rule Message
    MISSING_APIS_IN_DEFAULT_TAG The default tag should contain all APIs. The API path /subscriptions/{}/resourceGroups/{}/providers/Microsoft.Automation/automationAccounts/{}/modules/{}/activities/{} is not in the default tag. Please make sure the missing API swaggers are in the default tag.
    readme: specification/automation/resource-manager/readme.md
    json: Microsoft.Automation/stable/2022-08-08/module.json
    MISSING_APIS_IN_DEFAULT_TAG The default tag should contain all APIs. The API path /subscriptions/{}/resourceGroups/{}/providers/Microsoft.Automation/automationAccounts/{}/modules/{}/activities is not in the default tag. Please make sure the missing API swaggers are in the default tag.
    readme: specification/automation/resource-manager/readme.md
    json: Microsoft.Automation/stable/2022-08-08/module.json
    MISSING_APIS_IN_DEFAULT_TAG The default tag should contain all APIs. The API path /subscriptions/{}/resourceGroups/{}/providers/Microsoft.Automation/automationAccounts/{}/modules/{} is not in the default tag. Please make sure the missing API swaggers are in the default tag.
    readme: specification/automation/resource-manager/readme.md
    json: Microsoft.Automation/stable/2022-08-08/module.json
    MISSING_APIS_IN_DEFAULT_TAG The default tag should contain all APIs. The API path /subscriptions/{}/resourceGroups/{}/providers/Microsoft.Automation/automationAccounts/{}/modules is not in the default tag. Please make sure the missing API swaggers are in the default tag.
    readme: specification/automation/resource-manager/readme.md
    json: Microsoft.Automation/stable/2022-08-08/module.json
    MISSING_APIS_IN_DEFAULT_TAG The default tag should contain all APIs. The API path /subscriptions/{}/resourceGroups/{}/providers/Microsoft.Automation/automationAccounts/{}/modules/{}/objectDataTypes/{}/fields is not in the default tag. Please make sure the missing API swaggers are in the default tag.
    readme: specification/automation/resource-manager/readme.md
    json: Microsoft.Automation/stable/2022-08-08/module.json
    MISSING_APIS_IN_DEFAULT_TAG The default tag should contain all APIs. The API path /subscriptions/{}/resourceGroups/{}/providers/Microsoft.Automation/automationAccounts/{}/objectDataTypes/{}/fields is not in the default tag. Please make sure the missing API swaggers are in the default tag.
    readme: specification/automation/resource-manager/readme.md
    json: Microsoft.Automation/stable/2022-08-08/module.json
    MISSING_APIS_IN_DEFAULT_TAG The default tag should contain all APIs. The API path /subscriptions/{}/resourceGroups/{}/providers/Microsoft.Automation/automationAccounts/{}/modules/{}/types/{}/fields is not in the default tag. Please make sure the missing API swaggers are in the default tag.
    readme: specification/automation/resource-manager/readme.md
    json: Microsoft.Automation/stable/2022-08-08/module.json
    ⚠️ MULTIPLE_API_VERSION The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers.
    readme: specification/automation/resource-manager/readme.md
    tag: specification/automation/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2023-05-15-preview
    ️🔄ApiReadinessCheck inProgress [Detail]
    ️🔄~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest inProgress [Detail]
    ️⌛SwaggerAPIView pending [Detail]
    ️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️❌ModelValidation: 22 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    Rule Message
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: language
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runbook.json#L1177:26
    ExampleUrl: 2023-05-15-preview/examples/runbook/getRunbook.json#L27:23
    OBJECT_MISSING_REQUIRED_PROPERTY Missing required property: runbookType
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runbook.json#L1321:40
    ExampleUrl: 2023-05-15-preview/examples/runbook/createOrUpdateRunbook.json#L8:19
    OBJECT_MISSING_REQUIRED_PROPERTY Missing required property: runbookType
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runbook.json#L1321:40
    ExampleUrl: 2023-05-15-preview/examples/runbook/createRunbookAsDraft.json#L8:19
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: language
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runbook.json#L1177:26
    ExampleUrl: 2023-05-15-preview/examples/runbook/updateRunbook.json#L34:23
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: defaultPackages
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runtimeEnvironment.json#L397:37
    ExampleUrl: 2023-05-15-preview/examples/runtimeEnvironment/updateRuntimeEnvironment.json#L36:31
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: defaultPackages
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runtimeEnvironment.json#L397:37
    ExampleUrl: 2023-05-15-preview/examples/runtimeEnvironment/createRuntimeEnvironment.json#L61:31
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: defaultPackages
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runtimeEnvironment.json#L397:37
    ExampleUrl: 2023-05-15-preview/examples/runtimeEnvironment/createRuntimeEnvironment.json#L38:31
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: defaultPackages
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runtimeEnvironment.json#L397:37
    ExampleUrl: 2023-05-15-preview/examples/runtimeEnvironment/getRuntimeEnvironment.json#L24:31
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: defaultPackages
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runtimeEnvironment.json#L397:37
    ExampleUrl: preview/2023-05-15-preview/examples/listRuntimeEnvironmentsByAutomationAccount.json#L25:35
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: defaultPackages
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runtimeEnvironment.json#L397:37
    ExampleUrl: preview/2023-05-15-preview/examples/listRuntimeEnvironmentsByAutomationAccount.json#L45:35
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: defaultPackages
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runtimeEnvironment.json#L397:37
    ExampleUrl: preview/2023-05-15-preview/examples/listRuntimeEnvironmentsByAutomationAccount.json#L65:35
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: language
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runbook.json#L1177:26
    ExampleUrl: 2023-05-15-preview/examples/runbook/getRunbook.json#L27:23
    OBJECT_MISSING_REQUIRED_PROPERTY Missing required property: runbookType
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runbook.json#L1321:40
    ExampleUrl: 2023-05-15-preview/examples/runbook/createOrUpdateRunbook.json#L8:19
    OBJECT_MISSING_REQUIRED_PROPERTY Missing required property: runbookType
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runbook.json#L1321:40
    ExampleUrl: 2023-05-15-preview/examples/runbook/createRunbookAsDraft.json#L8:19
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: language
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runbook.json#L1177:26
    ExampleUrl: 2023-05-15-preview/examples/runbook/updateRunbook.json#L34:23
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: defaultPackages
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runtimeEnvironment.json#L397:37
    ExampleUrl: 2023-05-15-preview/examples/runtimeEnvironment/updateRuntimeEnvironment.json#L36:31
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: defaultPackages
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runtimeEnvironment.json#L397:37
    ExampleUrl: 2023-05-15-preview/examples/runtimeEnvironment/createRuntimeEnvironment.json#L61:31
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: defaultPackages
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runtimeEnvironment.json#L397:37
    ExampleUrl: 2023-05-15-preview/examples/runtimeEnvironment/createRuntimeEnvironment.json#L38:31
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: defaultPackages
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runtimeEnvironment.json#L397:37
    ExampleUrl: 2023-05-15-preview/examples/runtimeEnvironment/getRuntimeEnvironment.json#L24:31
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: defaultPackages
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runtimeEnvironment.json#L397:37
    ExampleUrl: preview/2023-05-15-preview/examples/listRuntimeEnvironmentsByAutomationAccount.json#L25:35
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: defaultPackages
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runtimeEnvironment.json#L397:37
    ExampleUrl: preview/2023-05-15-preview/examples/listRuntimeEnvironmentsByAutomationAccount.json#L45:35
    OBJECT_ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES Additional properties not allowed: defaultPackages
    Url: Microsoft.Automation/preview/2023-05-15-preview/runtimeEnvironment.json#L397:37
    ExampleUrl: preview/2023-05-15-preview/examples/listRuntimeEnvironmentsByAutomationAccount.json#L65:35
    ️🔄SemanticValidation inProgress [Detail]
    ️⌛PoliCheck pending [Detail]
    ️🔄PrettierCheck inProgress [Detail]
    ️⌛SpellCheck pending [Detail]
    ️🔄Lint(RPaaS) inProgress [Detail]
    ️⌛CadlValidation pending [Detail]
    ️️✔️TypeSpec Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for TypeSpec Validation.
    ️⌛PR Summary pending [Detail]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @ghost ghost added the customer-reported Issues that are reported by GitHub users external to the Azure organization. label May 15, 2023
    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 15, 2023

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️⌛ApiDocPreview pending [Detail]
    ️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    azure-sdk-for-go - sdk/resourcemanager/automation/armautomation - 0.9.0
    +	Field `Value` of struct `DscConfigurationClientGetContentResponse` has been removed
    +	Struct `ComponentsSgqdofSchemasIdentityPropertiesUserassignedidentitiesAdditionalproperties` has been removed
    +	Type of `Identity.UserAssignedIdentities` has been changed from `map[string]*ComponentsSgqdofSchemasIdentityPropertiesUserassignedidentitiesAdditionalproperties` to `map[string]*UserAssignedIdentitiesProperties`

    ️⌛ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 pending [Detail]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @ghost
    Copy link

    ghost commented May 15, 2023

    Thank you for your contribution sushil490023! We will review the pull request and get back to you soon.

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 15, 2023

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/automation/armautomation Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    JavaScript @azure/arm-automation Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @sushil490023, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

    TaskHow to fixPriority
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @sushil490023, For review efficiency consideration, when creating a new api version, it is required to place API specs of the base version in the first commit, and push new version updates into successive commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki. Or you could onboard API spec pipeline

    @raosuhas raosuhas added the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label May 17, 2023
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Please ensure to respond feedbacks from the ARM API reviewer. When you are ready to continue the ARM API review, please remove ARMChangesRequested

    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label May 17, 2023
    @raosuhas
    Copy link

    Can you please update the label

    Please ensure to respond feedbacks from the ARM API reviewer. When you are ready to continue the ARM API review, please remove ARMChangesRequested

    Can you please update the label once PR is ready for ARM review ?

    @raosuhas
    Copy link

    Hi, @sushil490023, For review efficiency consideration, when creating a new api version, it is required to place API specs of the base version in the first commit, and push new version updates into successive commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki. Or you could onboard API spec pipeline

    Please fix this comment as well

    @AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added the BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required label May 18, 2023
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @sushil490023, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.
    Note: To avoid breaking change, you can refer to Shift Left Solution for detecting breaking change in early phase at your service code repository.

    @sushil490023 sushil490023 force-pushed the feature-AuzreEnv branch 2 times, most recently from 123e6b9 to 215bd43 Compare May 23, 2023 10:22
    "x-ms-client-flatten": true,
    "description": "Gets or sets the automation account properties."
    },
    "id": {
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    id

    You can use below common type for tracked resource:

      "allOf": [
        {
          "$ref": "../../../../../common-types/resource-management/v5/types.json#/definitions/TrackedResource"
        }
    

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    We have not modified this resource. It came as part of the last stable version.

    "DeletedAutomationAccountProperties": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
    "automationAccountResourceId": {
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    automationAccountResourceId

    Is it an azure resource ID? If so, please add "format": "arm-id" and "x-ms-arm-id-details".

    https://github.com/Azure/autorest/blob/main/docs/extensions/readme.md#x-ms-arm-id-details

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    We have not modified this resource. It came as part of the last stable version.

    "in": "body",
    "required": true,
    "schema": {
    "$ref": "#/definitions/CertificateCreateOrUpdateParameters"
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    CertificateCreateOrUpdateParameters

    Any reason why PUT object and GET object are not the same?

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    We have not modified this resource. It came as part of the last stable version.

    @pratikjoshi14 pratikjoshi14 added the AzCoreIDCSignedOff Indicate sign off by IDC ARM reviewer for further review by ARM team label Oct 30, 2023
    @pratikjoshi14
    Copy link
    Contributor

    pratikjoshi14 commented Oct 30, 2023

    Since multiple reviews have happened on the PR and it was approved earlier, approved from AzCoreIDC side. Please get a final approval from ARM team.

    },
    "runbookType": {
    "type": "string",
    "description": "Type of the runbook."
    Copy link
    Member

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    enum?

    Copy link
    Member

    @rkmanda rkmanda left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    :shipit:

    @rkmanda rkmanda added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label Oct 30, 2023
    @openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Oct 30, 2023
    @mahakjain314 mahakjain314 removed the DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval label Oct 31, 2023
    @Alancere Alancere added the Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Go Approve the breaking change tracking for azure-sdk-for-go label Nov 1, 2023
    @mahakjain314
    Copy link
    Contributor

    /pr RequestMerge

    @rkmanda rkmanda merged commit 01ccc2e into Azure:main Nov 2, 2023
    26 of 31 checks passed
    Copy link

    Swagger pipeline restarted successfully, please wait for status update in this comment.

    jnlycklama pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2023
    * First Commit of Stable version
    
    * Add Swagger file for ARE
    
    * rename name to packageName
    
    * fix Package operation examples
    
    * Fixed Avacado errors
    
    * Fixed duplicate schema
    
    * Fix Duplicate schema erors.
    
    * Fix Duplicate schema erors.
    
    * Fix Duplicate Schema error
    
    * Fix Errors
    
    * Testing
    
    * Fix errors
    
    * Removed uuid format for PrincipalId in Identity properties
    
    * Fix example for ModelValidation Failure
    
    * Re-run Go SDK
    
    ---------
    
    Co-authored-by: Sushil Upadhyay <supadhyay@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: Alancere <804873052@qq.com>
    Co-authored-by: mahakjain314 <50352900+mahakjain314@users.noreply.github.com>
    zman-ms pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2024
    * First Commit of Stable version
    
    * Add Swagger file for ARE
    
    * rename name to packageName
    
    * fix Package operation examples
    
    * Fixed Avacado errors
    
    * Fixed duplicate schema
    
    * Fix Duplicate schema erors.
    
    * Fix Duplicate schema erors.
    
    * Fix Duplicate Schema error
    
    * Fix Errors
    
    * Testing
    
    * Fix errors
    
    * Removed uuid format for PrincipalId in Identity properties
    
    * Fix example for ModelValidation Failure
    
    * Re-run Go SDK
    
    ---------
    
    Co-authored-by: Sushil Upadhyay <supadhyay@microsoft.com>
    Co-authored-by: Alancere <804873052@qq.com>
    Co-authored-by: mahakjain314 <50352900+mahakjain314@users.noreply.github.com>
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-Avocado Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Go Approve the breaking change tracking for azure-sdk-for-go Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Python Approved-Suppression ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review Automation AzCoreIDC AzCoreIDCSignedOff Indicate sign off by IDC ARM reviewer for further review by ARM team BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required CI-BreakingChange-Go CI-MissingBaseCommit customer-reported Issues that are reported by GitHub users external to the Azure organization. new-api-version ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager SuppressionReviewRequired
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.