Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mgmt powerapps test #22201

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

mgmt powerapps test #22201

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dw511214992
Copy link
Member

@dw511214992 dw511214992 commented Jan 16, 2023

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @dw511214992 Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jan 16, 2023

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️🔄LintDiff inProgress [Detail]
    ️❌Avocado: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    Rule Message
    MISSING_APIS_IN_DEFAULT_TAG The default tag should contain all APIs. The API path /subscriptions/{}/providers/Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/skus is not in the default tag. Please make sure the missing API swaggers are in the default tag.
    readme: specification/sdkreleaseplannertest/resource-manager/readme.md
    json: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/stable/2019-08-01/databoxedge.json
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️⚠️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

    API Test is not triggered due to precheck failure. Check pipeline log for details.

    ️️✔️~[Staging] SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️~[Staging] CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️❌ModelValidation: 696 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L3710:26
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/DataBoxEdgeDevicePut.json#L30:15
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L311:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/DataBoxEdgeDeviceDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L687:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/BandwidthScheduleDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L737:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/DownloadUpdatesPost.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L830:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/InstallUpdatesPost.json
    INVALID_REQUEST_PARAMETER api-version 2019-03-01 is not equal to swagger version
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L1054:14
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/OrderGetAllInDevice.json#L2:17
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L1228:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/OrderDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L1449:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/RoleDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L1499:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/ScanForUpdatesPost.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L1555:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/SecuritySettingsUpdatePost.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L1773:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/ShareDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L1830:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/ShareRefreshPost.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L2048:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/SACDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L2269:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/StorageAccountDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L2515:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/ContainerDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L2576:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/ContainerRefresh.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L2801:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/TriggerDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L3130:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-05-01-preview/examples/UserDelete.json
    MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-09-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L4589:26
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-09-01-preview/examples/DataBoxEdgeDevicePut.json#L30:15
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-09-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L311:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-09-01-preview/examples/DataBoxEdgeDeviceDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-09-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L687:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-09-01-preview/examples/BandwidthScheduleDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-09-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L737:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-09-01-preview/examples/DownloadUpdatesPost.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-09-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L876:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-09-01-preview/examples/InstallUpdatesPost.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-09-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L1274:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-09-01-preview/examples/OrderDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-09-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L1541:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-09-01-preview/examples/RoleDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-09-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L1790:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-09-01-preview/examples/DeleteAddons.json
    MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-09-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L6415:38
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-09-01-preview/examples/ListMonitoringConfig.json#L16:11
    MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-09-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L6415:38
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-09-01-preview/examples/GetMonitoringConfig.json#L14:15
    MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-09-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L6415:38
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-09-01-preview/examples/PutMonitoringConfig.json#L34:15
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-09-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L2021:22
    ExampleUrl: preview/2020-09-01-preview/examples/DeleteMonitoringConfig.json
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️❌SpellCheck: 7 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    Rule Message
    HowToFix Unknown word (Fulfilment), please fix the error or add words to ./custom-words.txt
    path: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-05-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L5180:22
    HowToFix Unknown word (Fulfilment), please fix the error or add words to ./custom-words.txt
    path: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/preview/2020-09-01-preview/databoxedge.json#L7007:22
    HowToFix Unknown word (Fulfilment), please fix the error or add words to ./custom-words.txt
    path: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/stable/2019-03-01/databoxedge.json#L4098:22
    HowToFix Unknown word (Fulfilment), please fix the error or add words to ./custom-words.txt
    path: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/stable/2019-07-01/databoxedge.json#L4241:22
    HowToFix Unknown word (Fulfilment), please fix the error or add words to ./custom-words.txt
    path: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/stable/2019-08-01/databoxedge.json#L4907:22
    HowToFix Unknown word (Fulfilment), please fix the error or add words to ./custom-words.txt
    path: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/stable/2020-09-01/databoxedge.json#L7007:22
    HowToFix Unknown word (Fulfilment), please fix the error or add words to ./custom-words.txt
    path: Microsoft.DataBoxEdge/stable/2020-12-01/databoxedge.json#L7088:22
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️❌PR Summary: 0 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jan 16, 2023

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Breaking Changes Tracking



    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs] Generate from 1aa9d16f52a4758f90e7dc75bd971a397f3d99fa. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1mGeneratePackage: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:672
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m 672 | �[0m         �[36;1mGeneratePackage -projectFolder $projectFolder -sdkRootPath $s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1m         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1m�[36;1m     | �[31;1mFailed to generate sdk. exit code: False
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1mGet-ChildItem: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:760
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m 760 | �[0m … rtifacts += �[36;1mGet-ChildItem $artifactsPath -Filter *.nupkg -exclude *.s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1m               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1m�[36;1m     | �[31;1mCannot find path
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1m'/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/artifacts/packages/Debug/' because
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1mit does not exist.
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1mGeneratePackage: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:672
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m 672 | �[0m         �[36;1mGeneratePackage -projectFolder $projectFolder -sdkRootPath $s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1m         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1m�[36;1m     | �[31;1mFailed to generate sdk artifact
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
    • Azure.ResourceManager.Sdkreleaseplannertest [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from 1aa9d16f52a4758f90e7dc75bd971a397f3d99fa. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New major version of npm available! 8.19.3 -> 9.4.0
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v9.4.0>
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g npm@9.4.0` to update!
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-sdkreleaseplannertest [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]   - Initial Release
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from 1aa9d16f52a4758f90e7dc75bd971a397f3d99fa. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-sdkreleaseplannertest [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
      error	breakingChangeTracking is enabled, but version or changelogItem is not found in output.
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from 1aa9d16f52a4758f90e7dc75bd971a397f3d99fa. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/sdkreleaseplannertest/armsdkreleaseplannertest [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] This is a new package
      info	[Changelog]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from 1aa9d16f52a4758f90e7dc75bd971a397f3d99fa. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] A new release of pip available: 22.3.1 -> 23.0
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] A new release of pip available: 22.3.1 -> 23.0
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-sdkreleaseplannertest [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from 1aa9d16f52a4758f90e7dc75bd971a397f3d99fa. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh]  WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
      warn	No file changes detected after generation
    • ️✔️sdkreleaseplannertest [View full logs
    ️️✔️ azure-powershell succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from 1aa9d16f52a4758f90e7dc75bd971a397f3d99fa. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️Az.DataBoxEdge [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jan 16, 2023

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/sdkreleaseplannertest/armsdkreleaseplannertest https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/72742417f2bd4d8e91ed3ac86eff7c0f
    Java azure-resourcemanager-sdkreleaseplannertest https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/178ab6f85121453fa3db866dd06e8e91
    JavaScript @azure/arm-sdkreleaseplannertest https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/f171e0c72fda4c34a76e9eb611ea4c06

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi, @dw511214992, For review efficiency consideration, when creating a new api version, it is required to place API specs of the base version in the first commit, and push new version updates into successive commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki. Or you could onboard API spec pipeline

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @dw511214992 This PR was flagged for introducing a new RP namespace that is not being onboarded with RPaaS. Merging this PR to the main branch will be blocked as RPaaS is required for new RPs. To resolve this and allow the PR to be merged into the main branch, please use RPaaS to onboard the new RP.

    @zzvswxy zzvswxy added Approved-OkToMerge <valid label in PR review process>add this label when assignee approve to merge the updates DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval labels Jan 16, 2023
    @dw511214992
    Copy link
    Member Author

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-OkToMerge <valid label in PR review process>add this label when assignee approve to merge the updates CI-MissingBaseCommit CI-NewRPNamespaceWithoutRPaaS DoNotMerge <valid label in PR review process> use to hold merge after approval new-api-version new-rp-namespace resource-manager
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants