Skip to content

test: add ServiceBus SDK tests #1678

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hallvictoria
Copy link
Contributor

@hallvictoria hallvictoria commented May 7, 2025

Description

Adds ServiceBus SDK-type bindings tests (using emulator)
Adds ServiceBus Batch tests (using emulator)
Note: no SB topic tests yet

Migrates Blob SDK-type binding tests to use emulators
Moves HttpV2 tests into E2E directory
Adds HTTP triggered snake-case naming convention tests

Fixes #


PR information

  • The title of the PR is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which has an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
  • If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes in the description.
  • New Unit tests were added for the changes made and CI is passing.

Quality of Code and Contribution Guidelines

@hallvictoria hallvictoria marked this pull request as ready for review May 8, 2025 16:25
…-worker into extensions/azurefunctions-extensions-bindings-servicebus/1.0.0b1
@app.service_bus_queue_trigger(
arg_name="msg",
connection="AzureWebJobsServiceBusSDKConnectionString",
queue_name="testqueue")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we add a test for SB topics?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does the extension support topics?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants