Advantage over Microsoft Recommended CI/CD with Git Integration ? #317
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
I have a whole session about this when explaining the differences, pros and cons: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@NowinskiK I have watched a half of your session, But my question is about the NEW FLOW not old one... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have many teams that DON'T want the global approach to deploying through the MS ARM template process. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Greetings!
Thank for your work! It is amazing!
I can clearly imagine how this tool is useful for an individual.
Just one engineer doing work with DataFactory.
All those granual deployments of each component.
What I can not understand is what advantages this tool provides to a Team of engineers doing their work with one DataFactory.
Advantages over the CI/CD approach with Git integration, which is provided by Microsoft.
Here I refer to new CI/CD flow
All those granual deployments of the DataFactory components just won't work in the Team scenario.
It will require super extra effort to gather and compile changes made by several engineers and bring those changes to environment.
It will be much easier to just drop DataFactory and create new one and deploy complete state...
Could you please explain what I am missing...
Thank You!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions