-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
Support Fields Having Pre Select Scoring Zones [AARD-1894]
#1211
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ryanzhangofficial
wants to merge
9
commits into
dev
Choose a base branch
from
ryan/1894/support-fields-having-pre-select-scoring-zones
base: dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
37ab521
Add pre-select-scoring-zones
ryanzhangofficial 53a4da7
Update devtool key and zone sync
ryanzhangofficial 11ffb45
Add devtool caching
ryanzhangofficial 7973ec4
Add scoring zone caching
ryanzhangofficial 8c54364
Add scoring zone + caching tests
ryanzhangofficial d846edd
chore: formatting
ryanzhangofficial a44f0c9
Add export functionality + persistence
ryanzhangofficial e18c79a
Add persistent removal
ryanzhangofficial 141c9b3
chore: formatting and remove backslash escapes
ryanzhangofficial File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should try to put the
try
block around as small a section of fallible code as possible. It seems like the fallible function here is theevent
method call (obviously any file I/O is subject to failure as well, but since we're creating the directory, it shouldn't regularly fail), unless I'm missing something. So maybe we could more the try block to be just around theevent
method class.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would argue that most of the lines in the current
try
block is fallible. For example,const updatedBuffer = mirabuf.Assembly.encode(assembly).finish()
if the assembly is malformed.