-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 670
Fix local confusion in builtin min/max/rotl/rotr #1540
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how about make
getUnusedLocal
which try to find unused local in already allocated locals or allocate new one otherwise? And useflow.getUnusedLocal(type)
here and in other places?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
findUsedLocals
is what other code typically uses to keep the number of necessary locals low. Otherwise we'd always get a new local, never a reused one, I guess?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also
builtin_abs
,builtin_rotl
/builtin_rotr
I guess also required this fixThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Btw, at some point I expect us to move away from free'ing temporary locals, but we'll have to get rid of any kind of recompiling expressions first. There are still a few places doing this, and
getUnusedLocal
would return a new local upon recompile, yielding different code, whilefindUsedLocals
doesn't.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Abs is a unary expression not executing input code in between assignment and usage of the temporary locals. Should be safe. Going to take a look at rotl/rotr.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess better always alloc new loacal and let binaryen optimize all of this afterwards
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I expect us to move into that direction, yeah, but we cannot do that as long as we are recompiling code (and not resetting the local pool with a new mechanism) because it would confuse local flags (adding new locals on each recompile, leaving earlier ones unused), then for example leading to infinite loops when attempting to unify local flags in loops.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems that
rotl
for some reason does not exhibit the behavior onrotl(a, rotl(b, c))
, but should be susceptible just asrotr
is, which trivially breaks without the fix. Probably coincidence. Applied the same fix for both.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. Ok, in this case PR LGTM