Add dbtCoreCommandIntegation #1337
Conversation
mdesmet
force-pushed
the
feat/dbtcorecommand
branch
from
a317855
to
723e1e2
Compare
|
@coderabbitai full review |
Actions performedFull review triggered. |
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes across various files enhance the functionality and integration capabilities of the DBT-related classes. Key modifications include adjustments to conditional logic for better matching, the introduction of new classes for DBT core command integration, changes in method visibility to improve extensibility, and updates to dependency injection configurations. Additionally, specific command execution methods were refined for improved flexibility. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant DBTCoreCommandIntegration
participant DBTProject
User->>DBTProject: Request DBT integration
DBTProject->>DBTCoreCommandIntegration: Create instance using factory
DBTCoreCommandIntegration->>DBTCoreCommandIntegration: Execute SQL queries
DBTCoreCommandIntegration-->>User: Return results
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (5)
src/content_provider/sqlPreviewContentProvider.ts (1)
Line range hint
49-66: Consider implementing additional event handling.The
provideTextDocumentContentmethod sets up a file system watcher and handles changes, but there is a TODO comment about potentially handlingonDeleteandonCreateevents. It's important to consider implementing these to handle all aspects of file lifecycle management.Would you like me to help implement the handling for
onDeleteandonCreateevents, or should I open a GitHub issue to track this task?src/dbt_client/dbtCloudIntegration.ts (4)
Line range hint
45-58: Visibility Change Approved forgetDBTPathThe change in visibility from private to public for the
getDBTPathfunction is approved as it enhances modularity by allowing access from other modules. However, it is recommended to add unit tests to ensure that the function behaves as expected with the new visibility.Would you like me to help by writing some unit tests for this function?
Line range hint
60-117: Class Implementation Approved forDBTCloudDetectionThe implementation of the
DBTCloudDetectionclass is approved. It is well-structured and makes appropriate use of thegetDBTPathfunction. However, consider improving the clarity and helpfulness of error messages to enhance user experience.
Line range hint
119-145: Class Implementation Approved forDBTCloudProjectDetectionThe implementation of the
DBTCloudProjectDetectionclass is approved. The logic for discovering and filtering projects is clear and efficient. Consider enhancing the warning message about performance to include more specific consequences and possible mitigations.
Line range hint
147-999: Class Implementation Approved forDBTCloudProjectIntegrationThe implementation of the
DBTCloudProjectIntegrationclass is approved. The class handles a wide range of functionalities effectively and demonstrates good resource management and error handling. Consider adding more inline documentation for complex methods to aid future maintainability.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- src/content_provider/sqlPreviewContentProvider.ts (1 hunks)
- src/dbtPowerUserExtension.ts (1 hunks)
- src/dbt_client/dbtCloudIntegration.ts (1 hunks)
- src/dbt_client/dbtCoreCommandIntegration.ts (1 hunks)
- src/dbt_client/dbtCoreIntegration.ts (3 hunks)
- src/dbt_client/dbtIntegration.ts (1 hunks)
- src/inversify.config.ts (3 hunks)
- src/manifest/dbtProject.ts (3 hunks)
- src/services/deferToProdService.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
src/dbt_client/dbtCoreCommandIntegration.ts
[error] 68-69: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 69-69: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 70-70: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 74-75: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 75-75: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 76-76: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 123-124: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 124-124: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 125-125: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 158-159: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 159-159: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 160-160: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 193-194: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 194-194: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 195-195: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 231-232: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 232-232: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 233-233: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 266-267: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 267-267: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
Additional comments not posted (14)
src/content_provider/sqlPreviewContentProvider.ts (3)
Line range hint
33-41: Proper resource management indisposemethod.The implementation of the
disposemethod correctly handles the disposal of resources, ensuring that all event emitters, subscriptions, and file system watchers are cleaned up. This is crucial for preventing memory leaks and ensuring the stability of the extension.
Line range hint
68-100: Robust error handling and telemetry inrequestCompilationmethod.The
requestCompilationmethod is well-implemented with robust error handling and telemetry reporting. It handles different scenarios effectively, such as project loading delays and compilation errors, and ensures that these are reported back to the user clearly.
100-100: Review the updated conditional logic fordbtIntegrationMode.The change from a strict equality check to
startsWithallows for more flexible matching ofdbtIntegrationModevalues that begin with "core". This is a sensible update if there are multiple modes that share this prefix and need similar handling. However, it's important to ensure that this broader condition doesn't unintentionally match unwanted strings.Verification successful
Verification successful: Isolated use of
startsWith("core")The change to use
startsWith("core")fordbtIntegrationModeis isolated tosrc/content_provider/sqlPreviewContentProvider.ts. Other parts of the codebase use strict equality checks or switch statements, ensuring no unintended matches occur elsewhere. The update is specific to the logic in this file and does not impact other usages.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new conditional logic does not unintentionally match unwanted strings. # Test: Search for the configuration setting usage. Expect: Only valid configurations that start with 'core'. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'dbtIntegrationMode.startsWith("core")'Length of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new conditional logic does not unintentionally match unwanted strings. # Test: Search for the configuration setting usage without specifying file type. rg -A 5 'dbtIntegrationMode.startsWith("core")'Length of output: 49
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all occurrences of `dbtIntegrationMode` to understand its usage context. rg 'dbtIntegrationMode'Length of output: 2449
src/dbtPowerUserExtension.ts (1)
114-114: Review the conditional logic change fornewDbtIntegration.The addition of
"corecommand"to the array of acceptable values fornewDbtIntegrationexpands the scenarios under which the VS Code window will reload. This change seems to align with the PR's objective to enhance DBT integration capabilities. However, it's crucial to ensure that this new integration type is fully supported elsewhere in the application to avoid unexpected behavior.
- Correctness: The logic correctly checks if the
dbtIntegrationvalue has changed and if the new value is among the specified acceptable values before triggering a reload.- Maintainability: The use of an array for checking acceptable values is a good practice as it simplifies adding or removing integration types in the future.
- Performance: This change should not have a significant impact on performance since it only extends an existing condition.
However, it's recommended to verify that all parts of the application that interact with
dbtIntegrationare aware of and can handle the"corecommand"value appropriately.Run the following script to verify the handling of the
newDbtIntegrationvalue throughout the codebase:Verification successful
Verification Successful: Handling of
newDbtIntegrationis consistent.The
newDbtIntegrationvariable is only used within thesrc/dbtPowerUserExtension.tsfile, and the addition of "corecommand" to the list of acceptable values is handled correctly in the conditional logic. There are no other occurrences of this variable in the codebase, indicating that the change is localized and does not affect other parts of the application.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify handling of the `newDbtIntegration` value throughout the codebase. # Test: Search for the handling of `newDbtIntegration`. Expect: Consistent handling across the codebase. rg --type ts -A 5 $'newDbtIntegration'Length of output: 703
src/inversify.config.ts (3)
105-132: Well-implemented dependency injection forDBTCoreCommandProjectIntegration.The new factory binding for
DBTCoreCommandProjectIntegrationis correctly set up and uses dependency injection effectively. This enhances modularity and testability by allowing dynamic resolution of dependencies at runtime.
201-201: Correct integration of the new factory into existing bindings.The addition of
DBTCoreCommandProjectIntegrationto theDBTProjectfactory ensures that all components requiring this integration can access it seamlessly. This maintains consistency and functionality across the application.
Line range hint
1-201: Commendable structure and consistency in dependency management.The file is well-organized and maintains a consistent approach to defining and using Inversify bindings. This structure enhances the maintainability and readability of the code, adhering to best practices in dependency management.
src/dbt_client/dbtCoreCommandIntegration.ts (1)
15-16: Review of Class DefinitionsThe classes
DBTCoreCommandDetection,DBTCoreCommandProjectDetection, andDBTCoreCommandProjectIntegrationare defined as singletons and extend their respective base classes. This design pattern is consistent and ensures that these classes can be easily managed and instantiated within the application.Also applies to: 18-19, 21-22
src/dbt_client/dbtCoreIntegration.ts (3)
249-249: Review of access modifier change forpythonproperty.The change from
privatetoprotectedfor thepythonproperty allows subclasses to access thePythonBridgeinstance directly. This change supports the intention to make the class more extensible, particularly for subclasses that might need direct access to Python functionalities.
794-794: Review of access modifier change fordbtCoreCommandmethod.Changing the access modifier from
privatetoprotectedfor thedbtCoreCommandmethod enables subclasses to modify or extend the command execution logic. This is a positive change towards enhancing flexibility and extensibility in handling DBT commands in derived classes.
1034-1034: Review of access modifier change forthrowBridgeErrorIfAvailablemethod.The modification of the access modifier from
privatetoprotectedfor thethrowBridgeErrorIfAvailablemethod facilitates enhanced error handling customization in subclasses. This change aligns with the goal of making the class more adaptable and robust by allowing derived classes to implement their own specific error handling mechanisms.src/manifest/dbtProject.ts (3)
65-65: Approved: Import statement for DBTCoreCommandProjectIntegration.The import statement correctly adds the new
DBTCoreCommandProjectIntegrationclass from the appropriate module, which is necessary for the new integration functionality.
122-125: Approved: Declaration of dbtCoreCommandIntegrationFactory.The factory method
dbtCoreCommandIntegrationFactoryis correctly declared as a private member of theDBTProjectclass. This method is crucial for creating instances ofDBTCoreCommandProjectIntegrationbased on the provided path and diagnostics collection.
156-161: Approved: New case in switch statement for corecommand integration.The addition of the "corecommand" case in the switch statement is well-implemented. It ensures that the new
dbtCoreCommandIntegrationFactoryis used to instantiate theDBTProjectIntegrationwhen thedbtIntegrationconfiguration is set to "corecommand".
| if (currentConfig[relativePath]) { | ||
| return currentConfig[relativePath]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Streamlined Configuration Retrieval Logic
The changes in the getDeferConfigByProjectRoot method simplify the retrieval process by removing the initial check for dbtIntegrationMode being "core". This makes the code more straightforward and easier to maintain. The new logic directly checks for the existence of a configuration for relativePath and then checks for the dbtIntegrationMode being "cloud". This approach is cleaner and reduces the number of conditional branches, which enhances readability and maintainability.
However, consider adding a comment explaining why the deferToProduction is set to true by default when dbtIntegrationMode is "cloud". This would help maintain clarity for future maintainers or developers unfamiliar with the business logic.
Also applies to: 28-32
| async executeSQL( | ||
| query: string, | ||
| limit: number, | ||
| modelName: string, | ||
| ): Promise<QueryExecution> { | ||
| this.throwBridgeErrorIfAvailable(); | ||
| const showCommand = this.dbtCoreCommand( | ||
| new DBTCommand("Running sql...", [ | ||
| "show", | ||
| "--log-level", | ||
| "debug", | ||
| "--inline", | ||
| query, | ||
| "--limit", | ||
| limit.toString(), | ||
| "--output", | ||
| "json", | ||
| "--log-format", | ||
| "json", | ||
| ]), | ||
| ); | ||
| const cancellationTokenSource = new CancellationTokenSource(); | ||
| showCommand.setToken(cancellationTokenSource.token); | ||
| return new QueryExecution( | ||
| async () => { | ||
| cancellationTokenSource.cancel(); | ||
| }, | ||
| async () => { | ||
| const { stdout, stderr } = await showCommand.execute( | ||
| cancellationTokenSource.token, | ||
| ); | ||
| const exception = this.processJSONErrors(stderr); | ||
| if (exception) { | ||
| throw exception; | ||
| } | ||
| const parsedLines = stdout | ||
| .trim() | ||
| .split("\n") | ||
| .map((line) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| return JSON.parse(line.trim()); | ||
| } catch (err) {} | ||
| }); | ||
| const previewLine = parsedLines.filter( | ||
| (line) => | ||
| line && | ||
| line.hasOwnProperty("data") && | ||
| line.data.hasOwnProperty("preview"), | ||
| ); | ||
| const compiledSqlLines = parsedLines.filter( | ||
| (line) => | ||
| line && | ||
| line.hasOwnProperty("data") && | ||
| line.data.hasOwnProperty("sql"), | ||
| ); | ||
| const preview = JSON.parse(previewLine[0].data.preview); | ||
| const compiledSql = | ||
| compiledSqlLines[compiledSqlLines.length - 1].data.sql; | ||
| return { | ||
| table: { | ||
| column_names: preview.length > 0 ? Object.keys(preview[0]) : [], | ||
| column_types: | ||
| preview.length > 0 | ||
| ? Object.keys(preview[0]).map((obj: any) => "string") | ||
| : [], | ||
| rows: preview.map((obj: any) => Object.values(obj)), | ||
| }, | ||
| compiled_sql: compiledSql, | ||
| raw_sql: query, | ||
| modelName, | ||
| }; | ||
| }, | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Complex Method Review: executeSQL
This method is well-structured and handles SQL execution with detailed error handling and JSON parsing. However, there are several areas that could be improved for better readability and maintainability:
- Error Handling: The method uses a custom error processing function which could be more robust.
- JSON Parsing: The JSON parsing does not handle errors gracefully in all cases, which might lead to unhandled exceptions if the JSON is malformed.
Consider adding more comprehensive error handling around JSON parsing to ensure that all potential issues are gracefully managed.
Tools
Biome
[error] 68-69: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 69-69: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 70-70: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 74-75: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 75-75: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 76-76: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
| // internal commands | ||
| async unsafeCompileNode(modelName: string): Promise<string> { | ||
| this.throwBridgeErrorIfAvailable(); | ||
| const compileQueryCommand = this.dbtCoreCommand( | ||
| new DBTCommand("Compiling model...", [ | ||
| "compile", | ||
| "--model", | ||
| modelName, | ||
| "--output", | ||
| "json", | ||
| "--log-format", | ||
| "json", | ||
| ]), | ||
| ); | ||
| const { stdout, stderr } = await compileQueryCommand.execute(); | ||
| const compiledLine = stdout | ||
| .trim() | ||
| .split("\n") | ||
| .map((line) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| return JSON.parse(line.trim()); | ||
| } catch (err) {} | ||
| }) | ||
| .filter( | ||
| (line) => | ||
| line && | ||
| line.hasOwnProperty("data") && | ||
| line.data.hasOwnProperty("compiled"), | ||
| ); | ||
| const exception = this.processJSONErrors(stderr); | ||
| if (exception) { | ||
| throw exception; | ||
| } | ||
| return compiledLine[0].data.compiled; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of Utility Methods
The methods unsafeCompileNode, unsafeCompileQuery, validateSQLDryRun, getColumnsOfSource, and getColumnsOfModel share a similar structure and functionality. They all execute DBT commands and parse the output. Here are some suggestions:
- Refactoring Opportunity: These methods have repeated code, especially in command execution and JSON parsing. Consider creating a helper function to handle these operations.
- Error Handling: Similar to
executeSQL, the error handling around JSON parsing could be improved.
Refactoring these methods to use a shared utility function could reduce code duplication and improve error handling consistency across the board.
Also applies to: 134-167, 169-202, 204-240, 242-275
Tools
Biome
[error] 123-124: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 124-124: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 125-125: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
| private processJSONErrors(jsonErrors: string) { | ||
| if (!jsonErrors) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| try { | ||
| const errorLines: string[] = []; | ||
| // eslint-disable-next-line prefer-spread | ||
| errorLines.push.apply( | ||
| errorLines, | ||
| jsonErrors | ||
| .trim() | ||
| .split("\n") | ||
| .map((line) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| return JSON.parse(line.trim()); | ||
| } catch (err) {} | ||
| }) | ||
| .filter( | ||
| (line) => | ||
| line && | ||
| line.hasOwnProperty("info") && | ||
| line.info.hasOwnProperty("level") && | ||
| (line.info.level === "error" || line.info.level === "fatal"), | ||
| ) | ||
| .map((line) => line.info.msg), | ||
| ); | ||
| if (errorLines.length) { | ||
| return new Error(errorLines.join(", ")); | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| // ideally we never come here, this is a bug in our code | ||
| return new Error("Could not process " + jsonErrors + ": " + error); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Error Processing Function: processJSONErrors
This function is crucial for handling JSON errors across various methods. It is well-implemented with considerations for different error levels. However, the use of push.apply is unconventional and could be simplified using modern JavaScript features like spread syntax.
Consider refactoring this to use simpler and more readable constructs.
| async getCatalog(): Promise<Catalog> { | ||
| this.throwBridgeErrorIfAvailable(); | ||
| const bulkModelQuery = ` | ||
| {% set result = [] %} | ||
| {% for n in graph.nodes.values() %} | ||
| {% if n.resource_type == "test" or | ||
| n.resource_type == "analysis" or | ||
| n.resource_type == "sql_operation" or | ||
| n.config.materialized == "ephemeral" %} | ||
| {% continue %} | ||
| {% endif %} | ||
| {% set columns = adapter.get_columns_in_relation(ref(n["name"])) %} | ||
| {% for column in columns %} | ||
| {% do result.append({ | ||
| "table_database": n.database, | ||
| "table_schema": n.schema, | ||
| "table_name": n.name, | ||
| "column_name": column.name, | ||
| "column_type": column.dtype, | ||
| }) %} | ||
| {% endfor %} | ||
| {% endfor %} | ||
| {% for n in graph.sources.values() %} | ||
| {% set columns = adapter.get_columns_in_relation(source(n["source_name"], n["identifier"])) %} | ||
| {% for column in columns %} | ||
| {% do result.append({ | ||
| "table_database": n.database, | ||
| "table_schema": n.schema, | ||
| "table_name": n.name, | ||
| "column_name": column.name, | ||
| "column_type": column.dtype, | ||
| }) %} | ||
| {% endfor %} | ||
| {% endfor %} | ||
| {{ tojson(result) }}`; | ||
|
|
||
| const compileQueryCommand = this.dbtCoreCommand( | ||
| new DBTCommand("Getting catalog...", [ | ||
| "compile", | ||
| "--inline", | ||
| bulkModelQuery.trim().split("\n").join(""), | ||
| "--output", | ||
| "json", | ||
| "--log-format", | ||
| "json", | ||
| ]), | ||
| ); | ||
| const { stdout, stderr } = await compileQueryCommand.execute(); | ||
| const compiledLine = stdout | ||
| .trim() | ||
| .split("\n") | ||
| .map((line) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| return JSON.parse(line.trim()); | ||
| } catch (err) {} | ||
| }) | ||
| .filter( | ||
| (line) => | ||
| line && | ||
| line.hasOwnProperty("data") && | ||
| line.data.hasOwnProperty("compiled"), | ||
| ); | ||
| const exception = this.processJSONErrors(stderr); | ||
| if (exception) { | ||
| throw exception; | ||
| } | ||
| const result: Catalog = JSON.parse(compiledLine[0].data.compiled); | ||
| return result; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Method Review: getCatalog
The getCatalog method is complex and performs multiple operations including SQL compilation and JSON parsing. The method is critical for fetching catalog data but could benefit from the following enhancements:
- Code Clarity: The method's bulk SQL query is complex and spans multiple lines, which could be simplified for better readability.
- Error Handling: Enhance error handling around JSON parsing to prevent potential runtime errors.
Improving the readability and robustness of this method would greatly benefit the maintainability of the code.
| line && | ||
| line.hasOwnProperty("data") && | ||
| line.data.hasOwnProperty("preview"), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Static Analysis Tool Recommendations
The static analysis tool has identified several lines where the use of hasOwnProperty could be replaced with Object.hasOwn for better safety and modern practices. Additionally, it suggests using optional chaining to simplify the code.
Here are the recommended changes:
- line.hasOwnProperty("data") && line.data.hasOwnProperty("preview")
+ line?.data?.hasOwn("preview")
- line.hasOwnProperty("data") && line.data.hasOwnProperty("sql")
+ line?.data?.hasOwn("sql")
- line.hasOwnProperty("data") && line.data.hasOwnProperty("compiled")
+ line?.data?.hasOwn("compiled")These changes will make the code safer and more in line with modern JavaScript practices.
Also applies to: 74-76, 123-125, 158-160, 193-195, 231-233, 266-268
Tools
Biome
[error] 68-69: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 69-69: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 70-70: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
| @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ export class PythonDBTCommandExecutionStrategy | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| private dbtCommand(args: string[]): string { | |||
| args = args.map((arg) => `r'${arg}'`); | |||
| args = args.map((arg) => `r"""${arg}"""`); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential Security Risk: Ensure Proper Sanitization of Input
The change to use triple double quotes for argument formatting in the dbtCommand method enhances flexibility but also increases the risk of injection attacks. It's crucial to ensure that all inputs are properly sanitized before being used in this context.
Consider conducting a security review or audit to verify that the new argument handling does not introduce vulnerabilities. Here's a suggestion for improving input sanitization:
- args = args.map((arg) => `r"""${arg}"""`);
+ args = args.map((arg) => `r"""${arg.replace(/"/g, '\\"')}"""`);This change ensures that double quotes within the arguments are escaped, reducing the risk of injection.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| args = args.map((arg) => `r"""${arg}"""`); | |
| args = args.map((arg) => `r"""${arg.replace(/"/g, '\\"')}"""`); |
Overview
Problem
Describe the problem you are solving. Mention the ticket/issue if applicable.
Solution
Describe the implemented solution. Add external references if needed.
Screenshot/Demo
A picture is worth a thousand words. Please highlight the changes if applicable.
How to test
Checklist
README.mdupdated and added information about my changeSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Access Modifications
Dependency Injection