feat: lineage refactor #1212
feat: lineage refactor #1212
Conversation
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| @@ -173,14 +173,6 @@ export class LineagePanel implements WebviewViewProvider, Disposable { | |||
| return; | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| if (command === "openURL") { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is handled via altimateWebviewProvider
| window.addEventListener( | ||
| "message", | ||
| ( | ||
| event: MessageEvent<{ command: string; args: Record<string, unknown> }>, |
Check warning
Code scanning / CodeQL
Missing origin verification in `postMessage` handler Medium
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI 18 days ago
To fix the problem, we need to ensure that the postMessage handler verifies the origin of incoming messages against a list of trusted origins. This involves:
- Defining a list of trusted origins.
- Modifying the
postMessagehandler to check if the event's origin is in the list of trusted origins. - Logging and ignoring messages from untrusted origins.
| @@ -92,2 +92,4 @@ | ||
|
|
||
| const trustedOrigins = ["vscode-webview://"]; | ||
|
|
||
| window.addEventListener( | ||
| @@ -97,3 +99,3 @@ | ||
| ) => { | ||
| if (!event.origin.startsWith("vscode-webview://")) { | ||
| if (!trustedOrigins.includes(event.origin)) { | ||
| panelLogger.debug("invalid message ", event); |
…e-dbt-power-user into feat/lineage-v2
| @@ -188,17 +188,6 @@ export class QueryResultPanel extends AltimateWebviewProvider { | |||
| ); | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| private async checkIfWebviewReady() { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
moved to altimateWebviewProvider
* fix: names and types * WIP * WIP
WalkthroughThe changes involve a substantial refactor of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 21
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.js (1)
2-11: LGTM: Export declarations updated correctly with a minor suggestionThe export declarations have been appropriately updated to include the new components (CLL, CllEvents, Lineage) and reorganize existing exports. These changes align well with the PR objectives of enhancing the lineage component and improving maintainability.
For consistency and improved readability, consider sorting the exports alphabetically. Here's a suggested order:
export { a as ApiHelper, e as CLL, r as CllEvents, n as CodeBlock, i as ConversationGroupProvider, t as ConversationInputForm, C as ConversationSources, l as DbtDocs, p as Lineage };webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/components/help/HelpButton.tsx (2)
5-19: LGTM: Well-structured component with good UX considerations.The
HelpButtoncomponent is well-implemented, using theDrawercomponent effectively to display help content. The button styling and content are appropriate for its purpose.Consider adding an
aria-labelto the button for improved accessibility. You can modify thebuttonPropslike this:buttonProps={{ outline: true, + 'aria-label': 'Open help drawer', }}
1-21: Summary: Well-implemented component aligning with PR objectives.The
HelpButtoncomponent is a well-structured and focused addition that aligns with the PR's goal of enhancing maintainability through separate lineage components. Its clean implementation should facilitate easier updates and modifications in the future.To fully meet the PR objectives:
- Ensure this component is properly integrated into the lineage panel.
- Verify that it works correctly when the
dbt.enableLineageV2feature flag is enabled.- Consider updating the
README.mdto include information about this new help feature in the lineage component.webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/Demo.tsx (1)
11-22: Consider extracting the URL to a constant or configuration file.The documentation button implementation is good, using the executeRequestInAsync function to open the URL. However, it might be beneficial to extract the hardcoded URL "https://docs.myaltimate.com" to a constant or configuration file for easier maintenance and potential reuse.
Consider applying this change:
+ const DOCUMENTATION_URL = "https://docs.myaltimate.com"; // ... (in the onClick handler) executeRequestInAsync("openURL", { - url: "https://docs.myaltimate.com", + url: DOCUMENTATION_URL, });webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/MissingLineageMessage.tsx (1)
10-12: LGTM: Well-defined helper function.The
openProblemsTabfunction is concise and uses the existingexecuteRequestInAsyncutility effectively. Its purpose is clear from the name.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this function and what the "Problems" tab represents in the context of the application. This would enhance code readability for future maintainers.
webview_panels/src/AppConstants.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-31: Consider creating an issue for future lazy loading optimizationThere's a TODO comment at the beginning of the file regarding lazy loading. To ensure this optimization task isn't forgotten, consider creating a GitHub issue to track it.
Here's a suggested issue description:
Title: Implement lazy loading for route components
Description:
Currently, all route components are imported eagerly. Implementing lazy loading could improve initial load time and overall performance. However, there's a known issue with Vite's dynamic loading when CSS is involved.Tasks:
- Research how to fix the CSS loading issue with Vite's dynamic imports
- Implement lazy loading for route components
- Test thoroughly to ensure no regression in functionality
- Update documentation if necessary
Please create this issue if you agree it's worth tracking.
webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/lineage.module.scss (3)
1-19: LGTM! Good use of CSS custom properties for theming.The root and body styles are well-structured, with appropriate use of CSS custom properties for theming. The dark theme implementation aligns well with VSCode's theming approach.
Consider reviewing the necessity of
!importantdeclarations on lines 4 and 5. While they might be required to override VSCode styles, it's generally a good practice to minimize their use when possible.
31-40: LGTM! Consistent use of CSS custom properties for theming.The menu_card styles maintain consistency with the overall theming approach, which is good for maintainability.
Consider reviewing the necessity of the
!importantdeclaration on line 32. While it might be required to override other styles, it's generally a good practice to minimize their use when possible.
1-79: Overall, excellent styling that aligns well with PR objectives.This new SCSS file for the lineage component contributes significantly to the PR's goal of improving maintainability. The use of CSS custom properties for theming, consistent styling patterns, and support for both light and dark themes are all positive aspects that align with best practices for VSCode extension development.
The separation of lineage-specific styles into this module supports the PR's objective of creating separate components for lineage, which should facilitate easier updates and modifications in the future.
To further enhance maintainability, consider extracting common theme variables (like colors and spacing) into a separate SCSS file that can be imported across different components. This would centralize theme management and make it easier to maintain a consistent look and feel across the entire extension.
webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/components/help/HelpContent.tsx (1)
23-50: LGTM: Clear and informative content structure.The help content is well-structured and provides clear information about the lineage feature. The use of paragraphs and an unordered list improves readability.
Consider adding a brief explanation or link to instructions on how to add the API key in the extension settings. This could be helpful for users who want to access the column level lineage. For example:
You need to add API key in the extension settings to -view column level lineage. You can view model level lineage without an -API key. +view column level lineage. (See our <a href="#" className="text-blue">documentation</a> for instructions +on adding the API key.) You can view model level lineage without an API key.webview_panels/src/uiCore/theme.scss (1)
179-181: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the
.modal-contentclass is consistent with the existing styling patterns and correctly uses a CSS variable for theming. This change aligns well with the PR's objective of refactoring the lineage component.For improved readability and consistency with other sections, consider adding a brief comment above the new class definition. For example:
// Modal styles .modal-content { background-color: var(--background--04); }src/webview_provider/lineagePanel.ts (1)
Issues Found with Removal of
openURLCommand HandlingThe removal of the
openURLcommand handling insrc/webview_provider/lineagePanel.tsmay impact multiple parts of the codebase whereopenURLis still in use:
src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.tswebview_panels/src/modules/lineage/Demo.tsxwebview_panels/src/modules/lineage/components/help/HelpContent.tsxwebview_panels/src/modules/commonActionButtons/FeedbackButton.tsxnew_lineage_panel/src/service_utils.tsnew_lineage_panel/src/StaticLineage.tsxnew_lineage_panel/src/Demo.tsxnew_lineage_panel/src/ActionWidget.tsxPlease ensure that removing
openURLdoes not disrupt functionality in these areas. Consider refactoring or properly deprecatingopenURLacross the codebase to maintain application stability.Analysis chain
Line range hint
142-148: Approve change with suggestions for verificationThe update to extract
urlfromargs.params?.urlis a good improvement:
- It allows for a more nested structure in
args.- The use of optional chaining (
?.) is a safer way to access nested properties.However, there are a couple of points to consider:
Please verify that this change doesn't break existing functionality. Any code that previously relied on
args.urldirectly might need to be updated.The removal of the
openURLcommand handling is notable. Was this intentional? If so, please ensure that this functionality is not needed elsewhere in the codebase.To verify the impact of these changes, you can run the following script:
This will help identify any potential areas that might need updating due to these changes.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining usage of args.url or the openURL command rg --type typescript 'args\.url|openURL'Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining usage of args.url or the openURL command in TypeScript files rg 'args\.url|openURL' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 1258
webview_panels/src/assets/icons/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-140: Summary: Changes align with PR objectives, but consider some refinements.The changes in this file contribute to the PR's objective of refactoring the lineage component. The new
LineageDemocomponent provides a way to display a lineage demonstration, which aligns with the goal of creating separate components for lineage.However, to further improve maintainability:
- Consider addressing the TypeScript error without suppression, as suggested in the previous comment.
- Ensure that the
window.lineageGifglobal variable is properly managed and documented, as it's crucial for the component's functionality.- Update the
README.mdfile to include information about this new lineage demonstration feature and how to use it, as mentioned in the PR checklist.To enhance modularity and reduce dependencies:
- Consider moving the lineage-specific components (like
LineageDemo) to a separate file within alineagefolder. This would align with the PR's goal of creating separate components for lineage.- If
window.lineageGifis specific to lineage functionality, consider encapsulating it within a lineage-specific context or configuration, rather than relying on a global variable.These changes would further support the PR's objective of improving the maintainability of the lineage component.
src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.ts (3)
570-580: LGTM: New LineageGif constantThe addition of the
LineageGifconstant follows the existing pattern for asset URIs in this file, which is good for consistency. This suggests that a new visual asset (lineage.gif) is being introduced to the webview.For even better consistency, consider using the same naming convention as other constants in this method. For example, you could rename it to
LineageGifUrlto matchSpinnerUrl.
610-617: LGTM: HTML template modificationsThe changes to the HTML template are consistent with the earlier addition of the
LineageGifconstant and suggest the introduction of new modal functionality. The modifications look good and follow the existing structure of the template.For consistency with other variable names in the script section, consider using camelCase for the
lineageGifvariable name. For example:var lineageGifUrl = "${LineageGif}"This would match the naming convention of
spinnerUrl.
Line range hint
496-617: Summary of changes: Lineage visualization and webview improvementsThe changes in this file introduce new functionality for lineage visualization and improve the webview readiness checking mechanism. Here's a summary of the key changes:
- A new
checkIfWebviewReadymethod has been added to asynchronously wait for the webview to be ready.- A new
LineageGifconstant has been introduced, suggesting the addition of a visual asset for lineage representation.- The HTML template has been modified to include a new modal div and make the lineage GIF available to the webview's JavaScript.
These changes appear to be part of a larger feature implementation related to lineage visualization in the DBT Power User extension. The modifications are generally well-implemented and consistent with the existing codebase. Some minor optimizations and consistency improvements have been suggested in the individual review comments.
As this seems to be part of a larger feature implementation, ensure that:
- The lineage functionality is properly integrated with other parts of the extension.
- Appropriate error handling is in place for cases where the lineage GIF might fail to load.
- The new modal functionality is accessible and follows VSCode's UI guidelines.
- Performance impact of the new lineage visualization is monitored, especially if it involves loading large GIFs or complex visualizations.
src/commands/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
696-704: Consider reusing existing webview panelsThe current implementation creates a new webview panel each time the
sqlLineagecommand is executed. To improve user experience and reduce clutter, consider reusing existing panels if they're already open.Here's a suggested approach:
let sqlVisualizerPanel: vscode.WebviewPanel | undefined; // In the sqlLineage command handler: if (sqlVisualizerPanel) { sqlVisualizerPanel.reveal(vscode.ViewColumn.Two); } else { sqlVisualizerPanel = vscode.window.createWebviewPanel( SQLLineagePanel.viewType, `${modelName} - visualization`, vscode.ViewColumn.Two, { retainContextWhenHidden: true, enableScripts: true } ); sqlVisualizerPanel.onDidDispose(() => { sqlVisualizerPanel = undefined; }); } this.sqlLineagePanel.renderSqlVisualizer(sqlVisualizerPanel, lineage);This approach will reuse the existing panel if it's open, or create a new one if it's not, providing a more consistent user experience.
webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/LineageView.tsx (2)
36-36: Address the TODO regarding TypeScript genericsThere's a TODO comment to add a type generic for
executeRequestInSync. Ensuring proper TypeScript typings will enhance type safety and code maintainability.Would you like assistance in defining the generic types for
executeRequestInSync? I can help update the function to include appropriate type parameters.
106-113: Handle unknown commands gracefullyCurrently, unrecognized commands received in the message handler are ignored silently. For improved debugging and user experience, consider logging a warning or handling them explicitly.
Apply this diff to enhance command handling:
if (command in commandMap) { ( commandMap[command as keyof typeof commandMap] as ( args: Record<string, unknown>, ) => void )(args); + } else { + panelLogger.warn(`Received unknown command: ${command}`); }webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.d.ts (1)
301-303: Specify the event detail type forselectionendWhen extending the
HTMLElementEventMapinterface with a custom eventselectionend, it's good practice to specify the type of the event detail for better type safety. Ifselectionendcarries additional data, consider parameterizingCustomEventwith the appropriate type.For example:
interface HTMLElementEventMap { - selectionend: CustomEvent; + selectionend: CustomEvent<SelectionEndDetail>; }Replace
SelectionEndDetailwith the correct type of the event'sdetailproperty.src/webview_provider/newLineagePanel.ts (2)
394-395: Clarify Usage ofevent.eventfor ReadabilityThe pattern
event = this.queryManifestService.getEventByCurrentProject();followed byif (!event?.event) { return; }can be confusing due to the repetition ofevent. Consider renaming variables or destructuring to enhance clarity. For example:const projectEvent = this.queryManifestService.getEventByCurrentProject(); if (!projectEvent?.event) { return; }This makes the code more readable and reduces potential confusion.
Also applies to: 428-429, 558-559, 775-776
Line range hint
914-920: Handle Potential Errors ingetMissingLineageMessageThe
try-catchblock ingetMissingLineageMessagecaptures errors fromthrowDiagnosticsErrorIfAvailable(). Ensure that all exceptions are properly handled, and consider logging the errors or providing additional context to aid in debugging.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
webview_panels/src/assets/icons/lineage.gifis excluded by!**/*.gif
Files selected for processing (24)
- new_lineage_panel/src/service_utils.ts (1 hunks)
- src/altimate.ts (3 hunks)
- src/commands/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.ts (3 hunks)
- src/webview_provider/lineagePanel.ts (1 hunks)
- src/webview_provider/newLineagePanel.ts (23 hunks)
- src/webview_provider/queryResultPanel.ts (0 hunks)
- src/webview_provider/sqlLineagePanel.ts (6 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/AppConstants.tsx (2 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/assets/icons/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.d.ts (1 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.js (1 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/ActionWidget.tsx (1 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/Demo.tsx (1 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/LineageView.tsx (1 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/MissingLineageMessage.tsx (1 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/components/demo/DemoButton.tsx (1 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/components/help/HelpButton.tsx (1 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/components/help/HelpContent.tsx (1 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/lineage.module.scss (1 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/types.ts (1 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/uiCore/components/codeblock/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/uiCore/index.ts (1 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/uiCore/theme.scss (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- src/webview_provider/queryResultPanel.ts
Additional context used
Biome
src/webview_provider/sqlLineagePanel.ts
[error] 220-220: Unnecessary continue statement
Unsafe fix: Delete the unnecessary continue statement
(lint/correctness/noUnnecessaryContinue)
[error] 281-281: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
[error] 291-291: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
[error] 299-299: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.d.ts
[error] 9-19: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
[error] 297-298: This empty export is useless because there's another export or import.
This import makes useless the empty export.
Safe fix: Remove this useless empty export.
(lint/complexity/noUselessEmptyExport)
GitHub Check: CodeQL
webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/LineageView.tsx
[warning] 96-96: Missing origin verification in
postMessagehandler
Postmessage handler has no origin check.
Additional comments not posted (44)
webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.js (1)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement updated correctlyThe import statement has been appropriately updated to include the new identifiers that are being exported. This change aligns well with the modifications in the export declarations.
webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/types.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct and necessary.The import of
CollectColumnandDetailsfrom "@lib" is appropriate for the interfaces defined in this file.
3-6: LGTM: MissingLineageMessage interface is well-defined.The interface provides a clear structure for lineage-related messages, with appropriate types for each property. The use of a union type for the 'type' property is a good practice.
webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/components/help/HelpButton.tsx (2)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.The import statements are concise and relevant to the component's functionality. The use of both relative and absolute imports is consistent with best practices.
21-21: LGTM: Appropriate export statement.The default export of the
HelpButtoncomponent is correct and follows common practices for React components.webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/Demo.tsx (4)
1-3: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate and concise.The import statements are relevant to the component's functionality, using aliased paths for better organization. No unused imports are present.
5-29: LGTM: Well-structured component with clear layout.The Demo component is well-organized, using appropriate CSS classes for layout and flexbox. The structure is clear and easy to understand, with a header section and a main content area.
31-31: LGTM: Proper named export of the Demo component.The export statement correctly uses a named export for the Demo component, following best practices and allowing for easy import in other files.
1-31: Overall assessment: Well-implemented new component for lineage demo.This new Demo component aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing the maintainability of the lineage component. It contributes to the modular approach mentioned in the PR summary by creating a separate, focused component for the lineage demo. The implementation is clean, well-structured, and follows React best practices.
A minor suggestion was made to improve maintainability by extracting the hardcoded URL to a constant or configuration file. Otherwise, the component looks good and ready for integration.
webview_panels/src/uiCore/components/codeblock/index.tsx (2)
31-32: LGTM, pending theme impact verificationThe changes to the theme-related props appear to be intentional and aimed at providing more granular control over the theming of the
CodeblockLibcomponent. The rest of the component's logic and structure remain unchanged, which is good.Please ensure to test the component with different theme settings to confirm that the visual output matches the expected behavior with these new prop assignments.
31-32: Verify the impact of theme changes on the CodeblockLib componentThe changes to the theme props passed to the
CodeblockLibcomponent might affect its rendering:
- The
themeprop now directly uses the app's theme instead of the derivedcodeBlockTheme.- A new
editorThemeprop has been introduced, using the value previously assigned totheme.These changes suggest a more granular control over theming, but it's important to ensure they don't unintentionally alter the component's appearance or functionality.
To verify the impact of these changes, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any other usages of
CodeblockLibthat might need similar updates, and verify the prop definitions in theCodeblockLibcomponent to ensure they align with these changes.webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/MissingLineageMessage.tsx (4)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and appropriate.The imports are concise and relevant to the component's functionality. Good job on separating the type definitions into a separate file.
5-9: LGTM: Well-defined component with proper TypeScript usage.The component is correctly defined as a functional component with proper TypeScript typing for its prop. The optional prop and explicit return type enhance the component's flexibility and type safety.
39-39: LGTM: Appropriate export of the component.The default export of the component is correct and follows common React practices.
1-39: Overall assessment: Well-implemented component with minor improvement opportunities.The
MissingLineageMessageComponentis a well-structured and typed React component that aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing the maintainability of the lineage component. It provides a modular approach to handling missing lineage messages, which should improve the overall maintainability of the codebase.The component demonstrates good practices such as:
- Proper use of TypeScript for type safety
- Conditional rendering based on prop values
- Use of existing UI components and utility functions
To further enhance the component, consider implementing the suggested refactoring improvements mentioned in the previous comments. These changes will improve code readability and maintainability without affecting the component's functionality.
To ensure that this component is properly integrated and used within the project, run the following verification script:
This script will help verify that the new component is properly imported and used within the project, and that the required type definition exists.
webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/components/demo/DemoButton.tsx (5)
1-5: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and use appropriate aliases.The imports are logically structured, using aliases for better maintainability. All necessary components and hooks are imported.
7-9: LGTM: Component definition and state management are well-implemented.The
DemoButtoncomponent is correctly defined as a functional component. The use ofuseStatehooks for managing the visibility of the demo button and modal is appropriate and follows React best practices.
18-46: LGTM: Render method is well-implemented with appropriate conditional rendering and event handling.The render method effectively uses conditional rendering for the demo button and properly implements the modal with a close functionality. The use of
stopPropagationin the button's onClick handler is a good practice to prevent unintended event bubbling.
48-48: LGTM: Component export is correct.The
DemoButtoncomponent is correctly exported as the default export, following common React practices.
1-48: Overall, the DemoButton component is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives.The
DemoButtoncomponent effectively implements a temporary demo button that opens a modal with a demo of the lineage functionality. This aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing the lineage component and improving maintainability. The code is clean, efficient, and follows React best practices.Key points:
- Good use of React hooks for state management and side effects.
- Appropriate conditional rendering and event handling.
- Well-structured code with clear separation of concerns.
The only suggested improvement is to clear the timeout when the component unmounts to prevent potential memory leaks.
This new component contributes to the modular approach mentioned in the PR objectives, which should facilitate easier updates and modifications in the future.
webview_panels/src/AppConstants.tsx (2)
8-8: LGTM: Import statement for LineageViewThe import statement for LineageView is correctly formatted and consistent with other imports in the file.
29-29: LGTM: New route for LineageView addedThe new route for LineageView is correctly added to the AvailableRoutes object and is consistent with other route definitions.
To ensure the new route is properly integrated, please run the following verification script:
This script will verify:
- The correct import of LineageView
- The proper addition of the lineage route to AvailableRoutes
- The existence of the LineageView component file
Verification successful
Verification Failed: LineageView import not found in AppConstants.tsx
The initial verification script encountered an issue recognizing the TypeScript file type, preventing accurate checks. To address this, please run the following updated verification script:
This updated script uses
grepto avoid issues with file type recognition and will verify:
- The correct import of
LineageView- The proper addition of the
/lineageroute toAvailableRoutes- The existence of the
LineageView.tsxcomponent filePlease execute this script and provide the results for further analysis.
Verification Successful: LineageView route correctly implemented
The verification scripts confirmed that the
LineageViewcomponent is properly imported, the/lineageroute is correctly added to theAvailableRoutesobject, and theLineageView.tsxcomponent file exists in the expected location.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the LineageView component is correctly imported and used # Test 1: Check if LineageView is imported if ! rg --type typescript "import LineageView from \"@modules/lineage/LineageView\"" webview_panels/src/AppConstants.tsx; then echo "Error: LineageView import not found in AppConstants.tsx" exit 1 fi # Test 2: Check if the lineage route is correctly added to AvailableRoutes if ! rg --type typescript "^\s*\"/lineage\":\s*{\s*component:\s*<LineageView\s*/>\s*}," webview_panels/src/AppConstants.tsx; then echo "Error: Lineage route not found or incorrectly formatted in AvailableRoutes" exit 1 fi # Test 3: Verify LineageView component exists if ! fd --type f "LineageView.tsx" webview_panels/src/modules/lineage; then echo "Warning: LineageView.tsx not found in expected location. Please verify the file exists." fi echo "All checks passed successfully."Length of output: 280
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the presence of the LineageView import and route without relying on file type # Test 1: Check if LineageView is imported if ! grep -q 'import LineageView from "@modules/lineage/LineageView"' webview_panels/src/AppConstants.tsx; then echo "Error: LineageView import not found in AppConstants.tsx" exit 1 fi # Test 2: Check if the lineage route is correctly added to AvailableRoutes if ! grep -q '"/lineage": { component: <LineageView \/> },' webview_panels/src/AppConstants.tsx; then echo "Error: Lineage route not found or incorrectly formatted in AvailableRoutes" exit 1 fi # Test 3: Verify LineageView component exists if ! fd --type f "LineageView.tsx" webview_panels/src/modules/lineage; then echo "Warning: LineageView.tsx not found in expected location. Please verify the file exists." fi echo "All checks passed successfully."Length of output: 384
webview_panels/src/uiCore/index.ts (1)
31-31: LGTM! Please clarify the intended usage of the Modal component.The addition of the
Modalcomponent from reactstrap is consistent with the existing export pattern and expands the available UI components for use in the application. This change could potentially support the lineage refactoring mentioned in the PR objectives.Could you provide more context on how the
Modalcomponent will be used in relation to the lineage refactoring? This information would help in understanding the full scope of the changes and ensure that it aligns with the PR objectives.webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/ActionWidget.tsx (2)
1-18: LGTM: Well-structured imports and component declarationThe imports are appropriate for the component's functionality, and the
ActionWidgetcomponent is well-defined with properly typed props. This approach enhances code maintainability and type safety.
56-56: LGTM: Correct component exportThe component is properly exported as the default export, which is the standard practice for React components.
webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/lineage.module.scss (2)
20-30: LGTM! Effective use of flexbox for layout.The lineageView styles create a full-viewport layout with a flexible inner wrap. This approach provides a good foundation for responsive design.
42-55: LGTM! Well-structured action widget styles.The action-widget styles effectively position the widget and its buttons. The use of flexbox for button layout and z-index for layering is appropriate.
webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/components/help/HelpContent.tsx (3)
1-4: LGTM: Imports and component declaration are well-structured.The imports are appropriate for the component's functionality, and the component is correctly declared as a functional component returning JSX.Element.
66-66: LGTM: Component export is correct.The component is correctly exported as the default export, following React best practices.
1-66: Overall, well-implemented help component with minor suggestions for improvement.The
HelpContentcomponent is well-structured and provides clear, informative content about the lineage feature. The use of styled elements and links enhances readability and user experience.Main strengths:
- Clear explanation of lineage types and requirements.
- Well-organized content structure with paragraphs and lists.
- Provision of additional resources for users.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Consider using configuration or environment variables for URLs to enhance maintainability.
- Add a brief explanation or link to instructions for adding the API key.
These changes would further improve the component's maintainability and user-friendliness without significantly altering its current functionality.
new_lineage_panel/src/service_utils.ts (1)
41-41: Approve simplification, but verify extension compatibility and consider consistencyThe simplification of the message structure in the
openURLfunction is a good improvement that aligns with the PR's maintainability goals.Please ensure that the VS Code extension side can handle this new message structure. Run the following script to check for any inconsistencies in handling
openURLmessages:Consider applying similar simplifications to other functions in this file (e.g.,
openFile) for consistency. This would further improve the overall maintainability of the codebase.Verification successful
Verified extension compatibility and code consistency
The
openURLmessage structure change has been successfully verified. The VS Code extension correctly handles theopenURLcommand, ensuring compatibility with the updated message format.
- Handler found in
./src/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.ts:340openURLis properly exported and used in./new_lineage_panel/src/service_utils.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistencies in handling 'openURL' messages # Search for 'openURL' handler in the extension code rg --type typescript -A 10 "case 'openURL':"Length of output: 87
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistencies in handling 'openURL' messages by searching for 'openURL' handlers in .ts files # Find all .ts files and search for 'case 'openURL':' within them fd --extension ts --type file --exec grep -H -A 10 "case 'openURL':" {} \;Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broadly search for 'openURL' usage in .ts and .js files to locate any handlers # Search for 'openURL' in all .ts and .js files fd --extension ts --extension js --type file --exec grep -H -n "openURL" {} \;Length of output: 463
webview_panels/src/assets/icons/index.tsx (1)
27-27: LGTM: New import statement is correctly placed.The import for
LineageGifis appropriately added with other imports at the top of the file, maintaining good code organization.src/altimate.ts (1)
934-937: LGTM! Verify usage of the new type across the codebase.The renaming of
StaticLineageResponsetoSqlLineageResponseimproves consistency and clarity. This change aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing maintainability.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please verify that all occurrences of
StaticLineageResponsehave been updated accordingly throughout the codebase. Run the following script to check for any remaining instances:If the script returns any results, those occurrences should be updated to use
SqlLineageResponse.src/commands/index.ts (1)
703-703: Verify consistency with SQLLineagePanel classWhile the method name change improves clarity, it's important to ensure that this change is consistent with the
SQLLineagePanelclass implementation.Let's verify the
SQLLineagePanelclass implementation:If the
renderSqlVisualizermethod is not found in theSQLLineagePanelclass, consider updating the class to include this method or correcting the method name in this file.Verification successful
SQLLineagePanel class includes renderSqlVisualizer method
The
SQLLineagePanelclass insrc/webview_provider/sqlLineagePanel.tsincludes therenderSqlVisualizermethod, ensuring consistency with its usage insrc/commands/index.ts.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the SQLLineagePanel class definition ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'class SQLLineagePanel { $$$ renderSqlVisualizer($$$) { $$$ } $$$ }' # If the above doesn't yield results, search for any method named renderSqlVisualizer in the SQLLineagePanel file rg --type typescript 'renderSqlVisualizer' src/webview_provider/sqlLineagePanel.tsLength of output: 237
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the SQLLineagePanel class definition without specifying file type ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'class SQLLineagePanel { $$$ renderSqlVisualizer($$$) { $$$ } $$$ }' # Search for any occurrence of 'renderSqlVisualizer' in the SQLLineagePanel file without specifying file type rg 'renderSqlVisualizer' src/webview_provider/sqlLineagePanel.ts # List the contents of the src/webview_provider directory to verify the presence of sqlLineagePanel.ts ls src/webview_provider/Length of output: 459
webview_panels/src/modules/lineage/LineageView.tsx (2)
137-137: Confirm the inclusion ofDemoButtonThe
DemoButtoncomponent is rendered in the lineage view. Ensure that this is intended for production and not left over from testing or debugging.Run the following script to check if
DemoButtonis appropriately used across the codebase:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of DemoButton in the project. # Test: Search for all occurrences of 'DemoButton'. rg --type ts --type tsx $'DemoButton' # Review the contexts where 'DemoButton' is used. # Expectation: 'DemoButton' should only appear where it's intended in the production code.
96-101: Confirm the sufficiency of the origin check in the message event listenerYou have implemented an origin check using
event.origin.startsWith("vscode-webview://"). While this is a good practice, it's important to ensure that this check adequately secures the message handling against potential security risks.Run the following script to verify that the origin check correctly filters messages and that no unintended messages are processed:
Verification successful
Origin Check in Message Event Listener is Sufficient
The origin check using
event.origin.startsWith("vscode-webview://")inLineageView.tsxeffectively secures message handling. No other message event listeners without adequate origin checks were found in the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the origin check in the message event listener. # Test: Search for 'event.origin' usages to confirm proper origin checking. rg --type ts --type tsx -A 5 -B 2 $'event.origin' # Verify that all message event listeners include adequate origin checks. # Expect: All listeners should validate 'event.origin' before processing messages.Length of output: 197
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the origin check in the message event listener. # Test: Search for 'event.origin' usages to confirm proper origin checking. rg event.origin --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" -A 5 -B 2 # Verify that all message event listeners include adequate origin checks. # Expect: All listeners should validate 'event.origin' before processing messages.Length of output: 780
Tools
GitHub Check: CodeQL
[warning] 96-96: Missing origin verification in
postMessagehandler
Postmessage handler has no origin check.src/webview_provider/sqlLineagePanel.ts (1)
47-63: Verify superclass constructor parametersEnsure that the parameters passed to
super()in the constructor match the expected order and types defined inAltimateWebviewProvider. Any mismatch could lead to runtime errors or unexpected behavior.src/webview_provider/newLineagePanel.ts (7)
74-77: Ensure Correct Inheritance and ImplementationThe
NewLineagePanelclass now extendsAltimateWebviewProviderand implementsLineagePanelView. Verify that all necessary methods fromAltimateWebviewProviderare properly utilized, and that the implementation satisfies theLineagePanelViewinterface requirements.
85-102: Validate Constructor InitializationAdditional services have been injected into the constructor (
eventEmitterService,queryManifestService,usersService). Ensure that these services are correctly initialized and utilized within the class. Also, confirm that thesupercall passes all required arguments to the parent class.
103-116: Configuration Change Listener AddedA listener for configuration changes has been added to re-render the webview when
dbt.enableLineagePanelV2is modified. This ensures that the webview stays up-to-date with user settings.
165-171: Consistent Message Handling withsyncRequestIdThe
handleCommandmethod now includes an optionalsyncRequestIdin the message structure, enhancing asynchronous communication handling. Ensure that all command handling logic correctly utilizessyncRequestIdto maintain message synchronization.
Line range hint
181-252: IncludesyncRequestIdin ResponsesIn response messages,
syncRequestIdis now included within theargs. This improves response tracking between the webview and the extension. Confirm that all relevant responses consistently includesyncRequestIdto ensure reliable communication.
327-327: Unhandled Commands Delegated to SuperclassThe call to
super.handleCommand(message);allows unhandled commands to be processed by the superclass. Verify that the superclassAltimateWebviewProvidercan handle these commands appropriately, and that this delegation does not introduce unexpected behavior.
981-989: Conditional Webview Rendering Based on Feature FlagThe
renderWebviewViewmethod now conditionally renders the webview content based on theenableLineagePanelV2configuration setting. This allows for feature toggling between different versions of the lineage panel. Verify that both rendering paths function correctly and that the feature flag behaves as expected.
| export interface StaticLineageProps { | ||
| selectedColumn?: { table: string; name: string }; | ||
| collectColumns?: Record<string, CollectColumn[]>; | ||
| columnEdges?: [string, string][]; | ||
| tableEdges: [string, string][]; | ||
| details: Details; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM with a suggestion: StaticLineageProps interface is well-structured.
The interface provides a clear structure for static lineage properties, with appropriate use of optional properties and types. However, there's a potential improvement for the 'collectColumns' property:
Consider using a more specific type for the 'collectColumns' property. Instead of Record<string, CollectColumn[]>, you could define a type alias for better readability and type safety:
type TableColumns = Record<string, CollectColumn[]>;
export interface StaticLineageProps {
// ... other properties
collectColumns?: TableColumns;
// ... remaining properties
}This change would make the code more self-documenting and easier to understand at a glance.
| if (!missingLineageMessage) { | ||
| return null; | ||
| } | ||
| return ( | ||
| <Alert color="warning" className="p-2 mb-0"> | ||
| {missingLineageMessage.message} | ||
| {missingLineageMessage.type === "error" ? ( | ||
| <> | ||
| <Button | ||
| color="link" | ||
| className={"pt-0 pb-0"} | ||
| style={{ marginTop: -5 }} | ||
| onClick={openProblemsTab} | ||
| > | ||
| Click here | ||
| </Button>{" "} | ||
| to view Problems tab | ||
| </> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| "" | ||
| )} | ||
| </Alert> | ||
| ); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM: Component logic is sound and well-structured.
The component's logic is well-organized, with appropriate handling of the optional prop and good use of conditional rendering. The use of the Alert component for displaying the message is fitting.
Consider the following improvements:
- Extract the button rendering logic into a separate component or function to improve readability.
- Replace inline styles with CSS classes for better maintainability. For example:
- <Button
- color="link"
- className={"pt-0 pb-0"}
- style={{ marginTop: -5 }}
- onClick={openProblemsTab}
- >
+ <Button
+ color="link"
+ className="pt-0 pb-0 mt-n1"
+ onClick={openProblemsTab}
+ >- Consider using template literals for string interpolation instead of concatenation:
- <>
- <Button
- color="link"
- className="pt-0 pb-0 mt-n1"
- onClick={openProblemsTab}
- >
- Click here
- </Button>{" "}
- to view Problems tab
- </>
+ <span>
+ <Button
+ color="link"
+ className="pt-0 pb-0 mt-n1"
+ onClick={openProblemsTab}
+ >
+ Click here
+ </Button>
+ {` to view Problems tab`}
+ </span>These changes will enhance the component's maintainability and readability.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| // hide demo button after 10s | ||
| setTimeout(() => { | ||
| setShowDemoButton(false); | ||
| }, 10000); | ||
| }, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider clearing the timeout to prevent potential memory leaks.
While the useEffect hook is used correctly to hide the demo button after 10 seconds, it's important to clear the timeout when the component unmounts to prevent potential memory leaks.
Consider modifying the useEffect hook as follows:
useEffect(() => {
// hide demo button after 10s
const timer = setTimeout(() => {
setShowDemoButton(false);
}, 10000);
// Clear the timeout when the component unmounts
return () => clearTimeout(timer);
}, []);This change ensures that the timeout is properly cleared if the component unmounts before the 10 seconds have elapsed.
| if (lineageType === "sql") { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <div className={styles.actionWidget}> | ||
| <FeedbackButton url="https://app.myaltimate.com/contactus" /> | ||
| </div> | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using a configuration for the feedback URL
The feedback URL is currently hardcoded. To improve maintainability and flexibility, consider moving this URL to a configuration file or environment variable.
You could refactor this part as follows:
import { FEEDBACK_URLS } from '@config/urls';
// ...
return (
<div className={styles.actionWidget}>
<FeedbackButton url={FEEDBACK_URLS.sql} />
</div>
);This approach would make it easier to update the URL in the future and maintain consistency across the application.
| onClick={() => { | ||
| executeRequestInAsync("setLegacyLineageView", {}); | ||
| CLL.cancel(); | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for async function call
The async function call to set the legacy lineage view lacks error handling. Consider wrapping it in a try-catch block to handle potential errors gracefully.
You could refactor this part as follows:
onClick={async () => {
try {
await executeRequestInAsync("setLegacyLineageView", {});
CLL.cancel();
} catch (error) {
console.error("Failed to set legacy lineage view:", error);
// Optionally, show an error message to the user
}
}}This approach ensures that any errors during the async operation are caught and logged, improving the robustness of the application.
| nodeType: _node.resource_type, | ||
| nodeId: modelId, | ||
| }; | ||
| nodeMapping[key] = { nodeId: modelId, type: _node.resource_type }; | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| continue; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unnecessary continue statement
The continue statement at line 220 is unnecessary because it's at the end of the loop block. Removing it will simplify the code without affecting functionality.
Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary continue:
}
- continue;
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| continue; | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 220-220: Unnecessary continue statement
Unsafe fix: Delete the unnecessary continue statement
(lint/correctness/noUnnecessaryContinue)
| }); | ||
| break; | ||
| case "getColumns": | ||
| const body = await this.getColumns(params); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wrap variable declaration in a block within switch case
Similar to the previous case, the variable body should be scoped within a block to prevent unintended access by other cases.
Apply this diff:
case "getColumns":
+ {
const body = await this.getColumns(params);
this._panel?.webview.postMessage({
command: "response",
args: { id, syncRequestId, body, status: true },
});
break;
+ }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const body = await this.getColumns(params); | |
| case "getColumns": | |
| { | |
| const body = await this.getColumns(params); | |
| this._panel?.webview.postMessage({ | |
| command: "response", | |
| args: { id, syncRequestId, body, status: true }, | |
| }); | |
| break; | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 291-291: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
| } | ||
| switch (command) { | ||
| case "openFile": | ||
| const { url } = args; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wrap variable declaration in a block within switch case
Declaring variables directly inside a switch case can lead to unexpected behavior due to variable hoisting. Wrap the case "openFile": block in braces to localize the scope of the url variable.
Apply this diff to wrap the case in a block:
case "openFile":
+ {
const { url } = args;
if (!url) {
return;
}
await commands.executeCommand("vscode.open", Uri.file(url), {
preview: false,
preserveFocus: true,
});
break;
+ }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const { url } = args; | |
| case "openFile": | |
| { | |
| const { url } = args; | |
| if (!url) { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| await commands.executeCommand("vscode.open", Uri.file(url), { | |
| preview: false, | |
| preserveFocus: true, | |
| }); | |
| break; | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 281-281: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
| }); | ||
| return; | ||
| case "getLineageSettings": | ||
| const config = workspace.getConfiguration("dbt.lineage"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wrap variable declaration in a block within switch case
To avoid potential variable hoisting issues, wrap the case "getLineageSettings": block in braces. This confines the config variable's scope to this case only.
Apply this diff:
case "getLineageSettings":
+ {
const config = workspace.getConfiguration("dbt.lineage");
this._panel?.webview.postMessage({
command: "response",
args: {
id,
syncRequestId,
status: true,
body: {
showSelectEdges: config.get("showSelectEdges", true),
showNonSelectEdges: config.get("showNonSelectEdges", true),
defaultExpansion: config.get("defaultExpansion", 1),
useSchemaForQueryVisualizer: config.get(
"useSchemaForQueryVisualizer",
false,
),
},
},
});
break;
+ }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const config = workspace.getConfiguration("dbt.lineage"); | |
| case "getLineageSettings": | |
| { | |
| const config = workspace.getConfiguration("dbt.lineage"); | |
| this._panel?.webview.postMessage({ | |
| command: "response", | |
| args: { | |
| id, | |
| syncRequestId, | |
| status: true, | |
| body: { | |
| showSelectEdges: config.get("showSelectEdges", true), | |
| showNonSelectEdges: config.get("showNonSelectEdges", true), | |
| defaultExpansion: config.get("defaultExpansion", 1), | |
| useSchemaForQueryVisualizer: config.get( | |
| "useSchemaForQueryVisualizer", | |
| false, | |
| ), | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| break; | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 299-299: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
| this.queryManifestService | ||
| .getProject() | ||
| ?.throwDiagnosticsErrorIfAvailable(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add Null Checks to Prevent Potential Runtime Errors
In getMissingLineageMessage, the call to this.queryManifestService.getProject()?.throwDiagnosticsErrorIfAvailable(); may result in a runtime error if getProject() returns undefined. Add a null check to ensure safety.
Apply this diff to add a null check:
try {
- this.queryManifestService
- .getProject()!
- .throwDiagnosticsErrorIfAvailable();
+ this.queryManifestService.getProject()?.throwDiagnosticsErrorIfAvailable();
} catch (err) {
return { message: (err as Error).message, type: "error" };
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.d.ts (1)
297-298: Remove unnecessary empty exportThe empty export statement is unnecessary as there are other exports in the file. It can be safely removed to clean up the code.
Apply this diff to remove the empty export:
declare type ViewsTypes = keyof typeof VIEWS_TYPE_COLOR; -export { }Tools
Biome
[error] 297-298: This empty export is useless because there's another export or import.
This import makes useless the empty export.
Safe fix: Remove this useless empty export.
(lint/complexity/noUselessEmptyExport)
src/webview_provider/newLineagePanel.ts (5)
74-117: LGTM: Class refactor improves modularity and dependency injection.The
NewLineagePanelclass has been refactored to extendAltimateWebviewProviderand implementLineagePanelView. This change improves the class's modularity and allows for better separation of concerns. The constructor now uses dependency injection for various services, which is a good practice for maintainability and testability.A few minor suggestions:
- Consider using TypeScript's parameter properties to reduce boilerplate in the constructor.
- The
_disposablesproperty is not visible in this snippet. Ensure it's properly initialized.Consider refactoring the constructor to use parameter properties:
constructor( protected readonly dbtProjectContainer: DBTProjectContainer, private readonly altimate: AltimateRequest, protected readonly telemetry: TelemetryService, private readonly terminal: DBTTerminal, private readonly eventEmitterService: SharedStateService, protected readonly queryManifestService: QueryManifestService, protected readonly usersService: UsersService, ) { super( dbtProjectContainer, altimate, telemetry, eventEmitterService, terminal, queryManifestService, usersService, ); // ... rest of the constructor code }
Line range hint
165-327: Consider refactoringhandleCommandfor improved maintainability.The
handleCommandmethod has grown quite large and handles multiple responsibilities. While it's organized by command type, its length makes it harder to maintain and understand at a glance.Suggestions for improvement:
- Consider splitting this method into smaller, more focused methods for each command type.
- Implement a command pattern or use a map of command handlers to reduce the number of if-else statements.
- Use early returns to reduce nesting and improve readability.
Here's a high-level example of how you might refactor this method:
private commandHandlers = { openProblemsTab: () => commands.executeCommand("workbench.action.problems.focus"), upstreamTables: async (args) => { const body = await this.getUpstreamTables(args.params); return { body, status: true }; }, // ... other command handlers }; async handleCommand(message: { command: string; args: any; syncRequestId?: string }): Promise<void> { const { command, args = {}, syncRequestId } = message; const { id = syncRequestId, params } = args; const handler = this.commandHandlers[command]; if (handler) { const result = await handler(args); this._panel?.webview.postMessage({ command: "response", args: { id, syncRequestId, ...result }, }); return; } this.terminal.debug("newLineagePanel:handleCommand", "Unsupported command", message); super.handleCommand(message); }This refactoring would make the
handleCommandmethod more concise and easier to maintain, as each command's logic would be encapsulated in its own function.
Line range hint
541-757: RefactorgetConnectedColumnsfor improved readability and maintainability.The
getConnectedColumnsmethod is complex and handles multiple responsibilities. While it seems to work as intended, its length and complexity make it difficult to understand and maintain.Suggestions for improvement:
- Break down the method into smaller, more focused helper methods.
- Consider moving some of the logic (e.g., model fetching, SQL compilation) into separate services.
- Use more descriptive variable names to improve readability.
- Add more inline comments explaining the purpose of each section.
Here's a high-level example of how you might start refactoring this method:
private async getConnectedColumns(params: ConnectedColumnsParams) { const { event, project } = await this.validateAndGetEventAndProject(); if (!event || !project) return; const modelInfos = await this.prepareModelInfos(params, event, project); if (this.cancellationTokenSource?.token.isCancellationRequested) { return { column_lineage: [] }; } const request = this.buildColumnLevelLineageRequest(params, modelInfos, project); const result = await this.fetchColumnLevelLineage(request); return this.processColumnLevelLineageResult(result); } private async validateAndGetEventAndProject() { // ... implementation } private async prepareModelInfos(params: ConnectedColumnsParams, event: Event, project: Project) { // ... implementation } private buildColumnLevelLineageRequest(params: ConnectedColumnsParams, modelInfos: ModelInfo[], project: Project) { // ... implementation } private async fetchColumnLevelLineage(request: ColumnLevelLineageRequest) { // ... implementation } private processColumnLevelLineageResult(result: ColumnLevelLineageResult) { // ... implementation }This refactoring breaks down the large method into smaller, more focused methods, improving readability and maintainability.
Line range hint
981-994: LGTM: Good approach for gradual feature rollout.The
renderWebviewViewmethod has been updated to support a new version of the lineage panel. This is a good approach for gradually rolling out new features while maintaining backward compatibility.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider extracting the version check into a separate method for better readability and reusability.Here's a suggested refactor:
private isV2Enabled = () => workspace .getConfiguration("dbt") .get<boolean>("enableLineagePanelV2", false); protected renderWebviewView(webview: Webview) { if (this.isV2Enabled()) { this.renderV2WebviewView(webview); } else { this.renderV1WebviewView(webview); } } private renderV2WebviewView(webview: Webview) { this._panel!.webview.html = super.getHtml( webview, this.dbtProjectContainer.extensionUri, ); } private renderV1WebviewView(webview: Webview) { this._panel!.webview.options = <WebviewOptions>{ enableScripts: true }; this._panel!.webview.html = getHtml( webview, this.dbtProjectContainer.extensionUri, ); }This refactoring improves readability and makes it easier to maintain different versions of the webview rendering logic.
Line range hint
1-1048: Consider further refactoring for improved modularity and consistency.While the individual methods have been improved, the overall file structure could benefit from further refactoring:
- The file is quite large. Consider splitting it into smaller, more focused modules.
- There's a mix of async/await and Promise-based code. Standardize on async/await for consistency.
- Remove or address TODO comments and commented-out code sections.
- Consider creating separate services for some of the complex logic (e.g., lineage calculation, webview rendering).
Here are some high-level suggestions for improving the overall architecture:
- Create a
LineageServiceto handle the complex lineage calculation logic.- Move webview-related code to a separate
LineageWebviewProviderclass.- Use dependency injection consistently throughout the codebase.
- Create interfaces for the main classes to improve testability and maintainability.
Example structure:
// lineageService.ts export class LineageService { // ... lineage calculation methods } // lineageWebviewProvider.ts export class LineageWebviewProvider extends AltimateWebviewProvider { // ... webview-related methods } // newLineagePanel.ts export class NewLineagePanel implements LineagePanelView { constructor( private lineageService: LineageService, private webviewProvider: LineageWebviewProvider, // ... other dependencies ) {} // ... simplified methods using the new services }This structure would improve modularity, testability, and maintainability of the codebase.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- src/webview_provider/newLineagePanel.ts (24 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.d.ts (1 hunks)
- webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.js
Additional context used
Biome
webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.d.ts
[error] 9-19: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
[error] 297-298: This empty export is useless because there's another export or import.
This import makes useless the empty export.
Safe fix: Remove this useless empty export.
(lint/complexity/noUselessEmptyExport)
Additional comments not posted (7)
webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/altimate-components.d.ts (6)
21-25: LGTM: CllEvents enum declarationThe
CllEventsenum is well-structured and follows TypeScript conventions. It appropriately defines the events related to the CLL lifecycle (CANCEL, END, START).
27-27: LGTM: CodeBlock component props enhancementThe
CodeBlockcomponent has been updated with additional props (editorThemeandclassName) and refined type definitions. These changes improve the component's flexibility and customization options, aligning with modern React component patterns.Also applies to: 177-186
29-293: LGTM: Comprehensive type definitions with new interfacesThe addition of numerous new interfaces (e.g., CollectColumn, Column, ColumnLineage, Columns, Confidence, Conversation, ConversationGroup, ExposureMetaData, LineageProviderProps, ModalArgs, OpNodeArgs, SelectedColumn, SqlLineage, StaticLineage, StaticLineageDetails) significantly enhances the type safety and readability of the codebase. These well-structured interfaces follow TypeScript best practices and provide clear type definitions for various data structures used in the application.
279-286: LGTM: VIEWS_TYPE_COLOR constant declarationThe
VIEWS_TYPE_COLORconstant provides a centralized definition for view type colors, which can improve consistency across the application. The naming convention follows TypeScript standards for constants.
306-321: LGTM: Identifiers namespace declarationThe
Identifiersnamespace is a well-structured grouping of related constants. This approach effectively organizes and encapsulates values related to various aspects of the application, including themes, debugging, and remote URIs. It follows good TypeScript practices for constant management.
300-303: Verify usage of custom 'selectionend' eventThe global
HTMLElementEventMaphas been extended to include a custom 'selectionend' event. This is a valid approach to declare custom events. However, it's important to ensure that this custom event is actually used and dispatched in the application.To verify the usage of this custom event, you can run the following script:
This will help confirm that the custom event is being utilized in the application.
Verification successful
To address the issue with the previous search, please run the following script to verify the usage of the custom
'selectionend'event:
'selectionend' event usage verified
The custom
selectionendevent is actively used within the application as seen in the following file:
webview_panels/src/lib/altimate/DbtDocsRenderer.jsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of 'selectionend' event in the codebase rg --type typescript --type javascript "selectionend" -C 3Length of output: 93
Script:
# Searching for 'selectionend' event usage in .ts and .js files rg -e 'selectionend' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.js' -C 3Length of output: 1882
src/webview_provider/newLineagePanel.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1048: Summary: Significant improvements with opportunities for further refinement.The
NewLineagePanelclass has undergone substantial refactoring, resulting in improved modularity and functionality. Key improvements include:
- Extension of
AltimateWebviewProviderand implementation ofLineagePanelView.- Improved dependency injection in the constructor.
- Support for a new version of the lineage panel.
While these changes are positive, there are opportunities for further improvement:
- Further break down large methods like
handleCommandandgetConnectedColumns.- Standardize on async/await throughout the file.
- Consider splitting the file into smaller, more focused modules.
- Implement a more robust error handling strategy.
Overall, the changes represent a significant step forward in the codebase's evolution. Addressing the suggested improvements will further enhance the maintainability and scalability of the lineage functionality.
| export declare class CLL { | ||
| static isCancelled: boolean; | ||
| static inProgress: boolean; | ||
| static linkCount: number; | ||
| static onCancel(): void; | ||
| static cancel(): void; | ||
| static start(): void; | ||
| static end(): void; | ||
| static addLinks(n: number): void; | ||
| static showCllInProgressMsg(): void; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider refactoring the CLL class to a namespace or module
The CLL class contains only static members and methods, which is generally discouraged in TypeScript. To improve maintainability and adhere to best practices, consider refactoring this into a namespace or module with exported functions and variables.
Here's a suggested refactor:
export namespace CLL {
export let isCancelled: boolean;
export let inProgress: boolean;
export let linkCount: number;
export function onCancel(): void;
export function cancel(): void;
export function start(): void;
export function end(): void;
export function addLinks(n: number): void;
export function showCllInProgressMsg(): void;
}This approach maintains the same functionality while aligning with TypeScript best practices.
Tools
Biome
[error] 9-19: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/webview_provider/sqlLineagePanel.ts (1)
202-202: Use Consistent Node Type StringsIn assigning the
typeproperty for the node mapping, ensure that the string values match expected resource types. For example,"source"should match the resource type used elsewhere in the application to avoid inconsistencies.src/webview_provider/newLineagePanel.ts (1)
165-171: Standardize the use of 'id' and 'syncRequestId'In the
handleCommandmethod, bothidandsyncRequestIdare being used interchangeably. This can lead to confusion and potential bugs. Consider standardizing on a single identifier for request correlation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/commands/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/webview_provider/newLineagePanel.ts (23 hunks)
- src/webview_provider/sqlLineagePanel.ts (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/webview_provider/sqlLineagePanel.ts
[error] 220-220: Unnecessary continue statement
Unsafe fix: Delete the unnecessary continue statement
(lint/correctness/noUnnecessaryContinue)
[error] 281-281: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
[error] 291-291: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
[error] 299-299: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
src/webview_provider/sqlLineagePanel.ts (9)
38-40: ExtendingAltimateWebviewProviderEnhances Code ReusabilityBy extending
AltimateWebviewProvider, theSQLLineagePanelclass now inherits shared functionalities, promoting code reuse and improving maintainability as per the PR objectives.
47-63: Constructor Properly Injects DependenciesThe constructor correctly injects all necessary services and passes them to the superclass, ensuring that both the
SQLLineagePaneland its superclass are properly initialized with required dependencies.
250-261: RefactoredrenderSqlVisualizerMethod Improves ClarityThe
renderSqlVisualizermethod has been refactored for better clarity and efficiency. It streamlines the rendering process by directly posting messages to the webview after ensuring it's ready.
267-272: Enhanced Command Handling inhandleCommandMethodThe
handleCommandmethod now uses a switch statement for cleaner and more maintainable command handling. The inclusion ofsyncRequestIdsupports synchronous communication when necessary.
Line range hint
193-225: Efficient Mapping of Nodes innodeMappingThe updates to
nodeMappingcorrectly associate node IDs and types, improving the accuracy of the lineage visualization by ensuring that nodes are properly identified and rendered.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 220-220: Unnecessary continue statement
Unsafe fix: Delete the unnecessary continue statement
(lint/correctness/noUnnecessaryContinue)
31-31: Updated Type Definition fordetailsThe
detailsproperty in theSQLLineagetype has been updated toSqlLineageDetails, ensuring type correctness and better alignment with the data being handled.
15-15: Importing Necessary Types from../altimateThe import statement now includes
SqlLineageDetails, which is necessary for the updateddetailstype, ensuring that all required types are available.
25-27: New Imports for Expanded FunctionalityThe added imports of
AltimateWebviewProvider,SharedStateService, andUsersServiceindicate an expansion of functionality and integration with additional services, enhancing the capabilities of theSQLLineagePanel.
225-225: Consistent Use of Node Resource TypesEnsure that
currNode.resource_typereturns a string consistent with the expected values for node types. This consistency is crucial for correct rendering and interaction in the lineage visualization.src/webview_provider/newLineagePanel.ts (2)
913-915: Good job addressing the previous null check issueYou've successfully added a null check before calling
throwDiagnosticsErrorIfAvailable(), preventing potential runtime errors whengetProject()returnsundefined.
594-594:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure 'cancellationTokenSource' is initialized before use
In
getConnectedColumns,this.cancellationTokenSourceis used without checking if it's initialized. Ifthis.cancellationTokenSourceisundefined, accessing itstokenproperty will lead to a runtime error. Please ensure thatthis.cancellationTokenSourceis properly initialized before accessing itstoken.Apply this diff to add a null check:
- this.cancellationTokenSource!.token, + this.cancellationTokenSource?.token || CancellationToken.None,Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| @@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ export class VSCodeCommands implements Disposable { | |||
| ViewColumn.Two, | |||
| { retainContextWhenHidden: true, enableScripts: true }, | |||
| ); | |||
| this.sqlLineagePanel.resolveWebviewView(panel, lineage); | |||
| this.sqlLineagePanel.renderSqlVisualizer(panel, lineage); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Incomplete method renaming detected.
The method resolveWebviewView still exists in multiple files, indicating that the renaming to renderSqlVisualizer was not fully propagated. To maintain code consistency and prevent potential issues, please ensure that all instances of resolveWebviewView are updated accordingly.
Affected files:
src/webview_provider/lineagePanel.tssrc/webview_provider/altimateWebviewProvider.tssrc/webview_provider/sqlLineagePanel.tssrc/webview_provider/queryResultPanel.tssrc/webview_provider/newDocsGenPanel.tssrc/webview_provider/docsEditPanel.tssrc/webview_provider/modelGraphViewPanel.ts
🔗 Analysis chain
Improved method naming for better clarity.
The renaming of resolveWebviewView to renderSqlVisualizer enhances code readability by more accurately describing the method's purpose. This change is a step in the right direction for maintaining clear and self-documenting code.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify if this method has been renamed in all relevant files:
Correction needed for file type specification in search scripts.
The initial shell scripts failed because rg does not recognize typescript as a valid file type. To resolve this, we'll use the correct file type identifier ts for TypeScript files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of 'resolveWebviewView' in TypeScript files
echo "Searching for 'resolveWebviewView':"
rg --type typescript 'resolveWebviewView'
# Search for occurrences of 'renderSqlVisualizer' to ensure consistent usage
echo "Searching for 'renderSqlVisualizer':"
rg --type typescript 'renderSqlVisualizer'
Length of output: 330
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of 'resolveWebviewView' in TypeScript files
echo "Searching for 'resolveWebviewView':"
rg --type ts 'resolveWebviewView'
# Search for occurrences of 'renderSqlVisualizer' to ensure consistent usage
echo "Searching for 'renderSqlVisualizer':"
rg --type ts 'renderSqlVisualizer'
Length of output: 1138
| const event = this.queryManifestService.getEventByCurrentProject(); | ||
| if (!event?.event) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor repeated event retrieval and null checks
The pattern of retrieving the event and checking for its existence is repeated multiple times. Consider refactoring this into a helper method to reduce code duplication and improve readability.
You could create a helper method:
private getCurrentEvent(): ManifestCacheProjectAddedEvent['event'] | undefined {
const eventWrapper = this.queryManifestService.getEventByCurrentProject();
return eventWrapper?.event;
}Then, replace occurrences like:
const event = this.queryManifestService.getEventByCurrentProject();
if (!event?.event) {
return;
}With:
const event = this.getCurrentEvent();
if (!event) {
return;
}Also applies to: 428-429, 557-558, 774-775, 931-932
| protected renderWebviewView(webview: Webview) { | ||
| if (this.isV2Enabled()) { | ||
| this._panel!.webview.html = super.getHtml( | ||
| webview, | ||
| this.dbtProjectContainer.extensionUri, | ||
| ); | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Set 'webview.options' consistently
In the renderWebviewView method, this._panel!.webview.options is only set when isV2Enabled() is false. For consistency and to avoid potential issues, consider setting webview.options regardless of the feature flag.
Apply this diff to set webview.options in both cases:
protected renderWebviewView(webview: Webview) {
+ this._panel!.webview.options = { enableScripts: true };
if (this.isV2Enabled()) {
this._panel!.webview.html = super.getHtml(
webview,
this.dbtProjectContainer.extensionUri,
);
return;
}
- this._panel!.webview.options = { enableScripts: true };
this._panel!.webview.html = getHtml(
webview,
this.dbtProjectContainer.extensionUri,
);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| protected renderWebviewView(webview: Webview) { | |
| if (this.isV2Enabled()) { | |
| this._panel!.webview.html = super.getHtml( | |
| webview, | |
| this.dbtProjectContainer.extensionUri, | |
| ); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| protected renderWebviewView(webview: Webview) { | |
| this._panel!.webview.options = { enableScripts: true }; | |
| if (this.isV2Enabled()) { | |
| this._panel!.webview.html = super.getHtml( | |
| webview, | |
| this.dbtProjectContainer.extensionUri, | |
| ); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| this._panel!.webview.html = getHtml( | |
| webview, | |
| this.dbtProjectContainer.extensionUri, | |
| ); | |
| } |
Overview
Problem
Extract lineage component for better maintainability
Solution
Screenshot/Demo
A picture is worth a thousand words. Please highlight the changes if applicable.
How to test
dbt.enableLineageV2as true in settings.jsonChecklist
README.mdupdated and added information about my changeSummary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
NewLineagePanelwith improved functionality through integration with additional services.CLLfor managing cancellation and progress tracking.SQLLineagePanel.Improvements
CodeBlockcomponent to support new theme options.Chores
package.jsonto increase Node.js memory allocation during the build process.Bug Fixes