Format code (adding method overloading)

[gcatanese]

Format code after template change (adding method overloading)

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @gcatanese, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on updating the codebase to align with recent template changes, specifically by leveraging new method overloads for ObjectSerializer's serialize and deserialize functions, which simplifies their usage by removing a redundant argument. Concurrently, it introduces comprehensive support for new dispute-related webhooks, including dedicated typings, a handler for processing these events, and corresponding test coverage to ensure proper deserialization.

Highlights

• ObjectSerializer Usage Update: The ObjectSerializer.serialize and ObjectSerializer.deserialize calls have been updated across src/services/payment/paymentsApi.ts and within the templates-v7/typescript/api/api.mustache template. This change removes an unnecessary third argument (an empty string), leveraging new method overloads for these serialization functions.
• New Dispute Webhook Support: New types and a dedicated handler (src/typings/disputeWebhooks/disputeWebhooksHandler.ts) have been introduced to support the deserialization of dispute-related webhooks. This includes a GenericWebhook union type for broader handling.
• New Test Coverage: A new test case has been added to src/__tests__/webhooks/bankingWebhooks.spec.ts to validate the proper deserialization of DisputeNotificationRequest webhooks, ensuring the new functionality works as expected.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request primarily introduces functionality for handling dispute webhooks, including a new DisputeWebhooksHandler, associated types, and unit tests. Additionally, it refactors several API service calls by removing a redundant empty string argument for an optional format parameter in serialization/deserialization methods, which cleans up the codebase.

My review focuses on the new DisputeWebhooksHandler.ts file. I've identified a few areas for improvement related to robustness and error handling:

• Ensuring proper handling of potential JSON.parse errors in the constructor.
• Adding validation for the type property extracted from the webhook payload to prevent unexpected behavior with malformed inputs.
• Enhancing error messages for better debuggability by correctly stringifying object payloads.

These suggestions aim to make the new handler more resilient and easier to maintain. The other changes in the PR, such as test additions and API call simplifications, are positive and well-implemented. As no specific style guide was provided, my feedback adheres to general TypeScript best practices.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud