fix: Thinking about process labels during simple application debugging does not take effect

[shaohuzhang1]

fix: Thinking about process labels during simple application debugging does not take effect

[f2c-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[f2c-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[shaohuzhang1]

There are no apparent irregularities or major issues in the provided code. However, there is a small concern regarding trimming whitespace with trim_whitespace=False. While this setting does not affect these particular fields (reasoning_content_start and reasoning_content_end) directly, it might be better to explicitly include the field's description within the error messages to make the intent more clear.

Here's an updated version of the serializer with comments explaining the rationale:

class ModelSettingSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
    thinking_process_switch = serializers.BooleanField(
        required=False,
        default=False
    )

    # Start marker for thinking process
    reasoning_content_start = serializers.CharField(
        required=False,
        allow_null=True,
        default="<think>",
        allow_blank=True,
        max_length=256,
        trim_whitespace=False,
        help_text=_("This specifies the start of the thinking process."
                       " Default value '<think>'.")
    )
    
    # End marker for thinking process
    reasoning_content_end = serializers.CharField(
        required=False,
        allow_null=True,
        allow_blank=True,
        default="</think>",
        max_length=256,
        trim_whitespace=False,
        help_text=_("This specifies the end marker of the thinking process."
                        " If absent but 'thinking_process_switch' is True,"
                        " placeholders will be used.")
    )

In summary, ensure that any additional context or information about how the fields should be processed (e.g., using placeholders if both markers are not set) is clearly documented in the Django rest framework documentation. This helps prevent confusion during integration or maintenance.