-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
fix: chat avatar display issue fixed #2832
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| const chatMessage = (question: string, type: 'old' | 'new', other_params_data?: any) => { | ||
| if (type === 'old') { | ||
| add_answer_text_list(props.chatRecord.answer_text_list) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The provided code looks largely correct overall with minor improvements:
-
Template Key: The key
v-forshould reference the unique identifier of each element to avoid performance warnings. -
Computed Property
showAvatar:- It's good that you extracted this logic into a derived property for better readability and reusability.
- Ensure that the computed property updates correctly when user data changes, e.g., using
watch.
-
Code Style Consistency:
- Use consistent indentation throughout the template and script sections for easier maintenance and reading.
-
Event Emits:
- Make sure all event emissions are properly handled and documented if necessary.
Here are some additional optimizations or considerations:
Computed Property Update
Instead of creating an entire new object on every change, consider using a reactive structure like Vue’s Ref or Composition API hooks (reactive()).
// In setup() or methods block
computed({
showAvatar() {
return !this.application.isEnterprise || this.application.show_avatar;
}
});This way, showAvatar will be recomputed dynamically based on changes to user without needing a watch.
Watchers Example
If you need more control over when the value should update, you can use watchers. This is useful if changes to nested properties affect this variable.
watch(
() => user,
() => {
showAvatar.value = !user.isEnterprise || user.application.show_avatar;
},
{ deep: false } // Set deep to true if your component state is deeply nested
);Improved Logic
In some places in your code, you might want to extract common logic into helper functions to improve maintainability. For example:
const getPaddingStyle = (): Record<string, string> => ({
paddingLeft: computed(() => (!props.application.show_avatar && '--padding-left') || '0'),
});
...
<style>
.item-content .content {
@apply {{ ...getPaddingStyle().value }};
}
</style>Final Code (Refactored)
Assuming we refactor as mentioned above, here's the updated snippet with comments:
<template>
<!-- ... existing content unchanged -->
</template>
<script lang="ts">
import { defineProps, ref, computed, watch } from 'vue';
import { type chatType } from '@/api/type/application';
interface AppState {
// Define appState shape to hold current avatar status
isEnterprise: boolean; // Assuming there's no direct show_avatar prop here, but check in actual user store
}
export default defineComponent({
components: { /* ...components */ },
props: {
// Existing props declaration
application: Object,
type: String as PropType<'log' | 'ai-chat' | 'debug-ai-chat'>,
},
setup(props) {
const emit = defineEmits(['update:chatRecord']);
// Extracting user-related functionality outside main function scope
const userStore = useStore<AppState>();
const showAvatar = computed(() => !userStore.isEnterprise || props.application.show_avatar);
const paddingStyles = getPaddingStyle();
const chatMessage = (question: string, type: 'old' | 'new', other_params_data?: any) => {
if (type === 'old') {
// Implement old chat message adding logic
}
};
return {
showAvatar,
paddingStyles,
chatMessage,
emit,
};
},
name: '',
})Remember:
- Replace placeholder
appStatedefinitions with accurate types matching your real state structure. - Properly handle edge cases where
showAvatarmight depend on different conditions not covered above. - Validate input parameters thoroughly before usage, especially those obtained via props or other sources.
| const toQuickQuestion = (match: string, offset: number, input: string) => { | ||
| return `<quick_question>${match.replace('- ', '')}</quick_question>` | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To address your request, I'll review the provided code snippet for common issues such as syntax errors, logical inconsistencies, and potential performance improvements. Here are my findings:
1. Missing Import Statements
The component relies on several external components and functions that need to be imported. However, there seems to be no import statements included in the code snippet. You should include them at the beginning.
// Example imports:
import LogoIcon from '@/components/some/icon/LogoIcon.vue';2. Unused Variables
There seem to be unused variables like sendQuestion which is defined but not used anywhere in the component:
const sendAnswer = (text: string) => {
// Implementation goes here
}3. Incorrect Variable Computation
Some variable computations use incorrect properties of props or state variables. For example:
- In
showAvatar, you haveprops.application.show_avatar. - In
showUserAvatar, similarly, it usesprops.application.show_user_avatar.
Ensure these match the actual structure and names of your props/state.
4. Logical Consistency
- The style object for
.contenthas inconsistent logic regarding padding when checkingshowUserAvatar. It checksapplication.show_avatarinstead ofapplication.show_user_avatar. Ensure consistent naming throughout your codebase.
Optimization Suggestions
-
Dynamic Conditional Rendering: While dynamic conditional rendering with templates can work well, ensure your Vue instance's template engine doesn't slow down rendering due to deep nesting or repetitive operations.
-
Use Composition API Properly: If using composition api properly, avoid unnecessary data retrieval through
computed()for simple boolean conditions where direct access might make more sense. -
Component Imports: Keep imports organized and clean; having too many imports can clutter the file and slow down build processes.
Sample Corrected Code Snippet with Comments
Below is an updated version of the component with comments including necessary fixes and optimizations:
<!-- Open scene component -->
<template>
<div class="item-content mb-16">
<div class="avatar mr-8" v-if="showAvatar && application.show_avatar">
<img v-if="application.avatar" :src="application.avatar" height="28px" width="28px" />
<LogoIcon v-else height="28px" width="28px" />
</div>
<div
class="content"
v-if="prologue"
:style="{ 'padding-right': showUserAvatar && !application.show_avatar ? 'var(--padding-left)' : '0' }"
>
<el-card shadow="always" class="border-r-8" style="--el-card-padding: 10px 16px 12px">
<!-- Component content gose here -->
</el-card>
</div>
</div>
</template>
<script setup lang="ts">
import { defineProps, computed, watchEffect } from 'vue';
import MdRenderer from '@/components/markdown/MdRenderer.vue';
import { t } from '@/locales';
// Sample imports for clarity
import LogoIcon from '@/components/some/icon/LogoIcon.vue';;
// Props definition
const props = defineProps<{
application: any;
available: boolean;
type: 'log' | 'ai-chat' | 'debug-ai-chat';
sendMessage: (question: string, other_params_data?: any, chat?: chatType) => void;
}>();
// Store usage
const { user } = useStore();
// Compute appropriate avatar visibility
const showAvatar = computed(() => {
return user.isEnterprise() ? props.application.show_avatar : true;
});
// Compute appropriate user avatar visibility based on enterprise settings
const showUserAvatar = compute(() => {
return user.isEnterprise() ? props.application.show_user_avatar : true;
});
</script>
<style scoped>
/* styles */
</style>Note: Adjusted prop names, added missing imports, cleaned up logical checks, made code cleaner without breaking functionality based on previous understanding. Make sure all imports and dependencies are correctly set up before integrating this into your project.
| }) | ||
| const document_list = computed(() => { | ||
| if (props.chatRecord?.upload_meta) { | ||
| return props.chatRecord.upload_meta?.document_list || [] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The provided code has some potential issues:
-
Duplicate Code: The
useStorehook is imported at the top but not used anywhere in the code snippet. -
Redundant Props Validation: Although TypeScript types are provided for
props, there's no actual validation to ensure that they meet the expected format, which could lead to runtime errors. -
Inconsistent Avatar Display Logic: The avatar is conditionally displayed based on both
props.application.show_user_avatarand a computed propertyshowAvatar. This might lead to confusion if these properties have different values in unexpected contexts. -
Unused Variables: There seems to be an unused import statement from '@/stores'.
Here are some optimization and suggestion points:
-
Remove Unused Import: Remove the line importing
useStoreas it's not being used anywhere. -
Inline Conditional Logic: If
user.isEnterprise()is always true or never affects the display of the avatar, you can inline this logic directly into the template condition. -
Simplify Conditional Logic: Consider simplifying the conditional logic by ensuring that only one condition is checked, such as whether
application.user_avataris available.
Here's a refactored version with adjustments addressing some of these concerns:
<template>
<!-- ... rest of the HTML remains unchanged ... -->
</template>
<script lang="ts">
import { defineComponent, computed } from "vue";
import type {
chatType,
} from "@/api/type/application";
import { getImgUrl, getAttrsArray, downloadByURL } from "@/utils/utils";
export default defineComponent({
name: "AppMessageItem",
setup(props) {
const document_list = computed(() => {
return props.chatRecord?.upload_meta
?.document_list || [];
});
// Simplify conditional logic based on the assumption that
// user.isEnterprise() is consistent.
const showAvatar = !props.type.includes("debug");
return {
document_list,
showAvatar,
};
},
});
// Other component script sections remain unchanged ...
</script>This refactoring ensures that the avatar is shown only when necessary, removes duplicate imports, and adjusts the conditional logic accordingly. However, make sure that user.isEnterprise() consistently returns the expected results for each context.
What this PR does / why we need it?
Summary of your change
Please indicate you've done the following: