Skip to content

fix: When switching application models, the model parameters should be set to the default values of the current model #2826

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2025

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: When switching application models, the model parameters should be set to the default values of the current model

…e set to the default values of the current model
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Apr 8, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Apr 8, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit 43702e4 into main Apr 8, 2025
4 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@main@fix_ai_chat_model_params branch April 8, 2025 08:43
@@ -127,7 +128,6 @@ const openCreateModel = (provider?: Provider, model_type?: string) => {
if (provider && provider.provider) {
createModelRef.value?.open(provider, model_type)
} else {
console.log(model_type)
selectProviderRef.value?.open(model_type)
}
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code looks mostly regular, but here are some minor improvements:

  1. Avoid printing to the console unless necessary (console.log is fine for development purposes).
  2. Ensure that modelType being passed to selectProviderRef.open() has a meaningful value before calling it.

Overall, your function structure and logic appear to be correct with these adjustments. If you have more specific concerns or need further optimization for this particular implementation, feel free to ask!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant