-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
fix: The form recall node cannot respond #2824
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
if (chatRecord) { | ||
chatRecord.open() | ||
} | ||
} | ||
/** | ||
* 等待所有数据输出完毕后 才会关闭流 | ||
* @param chatRecordId 对话记录id |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review of Code
@@ -442,6 +442,12 @@ export class ChatManagement {
chatRecord.write()
}
+static open(chatRecordId: string) {
+ const chatRecord = this.chatMessageContainer[chatRecordId]
+ if (chatRecord) {
+ chatRecord.open()
+ }
+}
+
/**
* 等待所有数据输出完毕后 才会关闭流
* @param chatRecordId 对话记录id
Suggestions:
- Ensure that
this.chatMessageContainer
is properly initialized before using it to avoid potential errors when accessing non-existent keys. - Add null checks around the
chatMessageContainer
access and ensure that all methods (write
,open
) are defined correctly in theChatRecord
interface or type definition to prevent runtime exceptions.
Optimizations
- Consider moving the initialization of
this.chatMessageContainer
during the creation ofChatManagement
instance instead of relying solely on static accessor properties likechatMessageContainer
.
Alternative Initialization:
export class ChatManagement {
private _chatMessageContainer: Record<string, any> = {}; // Assuming ChatRecord is a generic object
constructor() {
this._chatMessageContainer = {};
}
// Rest of the code remains unchanged.
By making these changes, you can ensure better encapsulation and handle edge cases more gracefully.
@@ -91,6 +90,7 @@ const chatMessage = (question: string, type: 'old' | 'new', other_params_data?: | |||
if (type === 'old') { | |||
add_answer_text_list(props.chatRecord.answer_text_list) | |||
props.sendMessage(question, other_params_data, props.chatRecord) | |||
props.chatManagement.open(props.chatRecord.id) | |||
props.chatManagement.write(props.chatRecord.id) | |||
} else { | |||
props.sendMessage(question, other_params_data) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The provided code appears to be part of a Vue.js component that handles user input and chat management. Here's an analysis with potential suggestions:
Potential Issues:
- Duplicate Code: The
add_answer_text_list
function is called within both branches of theif (type === 'old')
condition, which might be unnecessary. - Unnecessary Condition: The
else
block can be simplified since similar logic applies whentype !== 'old'
.
Optimization Suggestions:
// Simplified chatMessage method
const chatMessage = async (
question: string,
type: 'old' | 'new',
other_params_data?: Record<string, any>
): Promise<void> => {
const messageData = await fetchApi('create-message', { question });
// Handle old message type specifically
if (type === 'old') {
addAnswerTextList(messageData.answer_texts);
handleChatRecordUpdate(messageData);
notifyUser("New Message Added!");
props.chatManagement.refresh();
}
// Standard message handling for non-old types
const paramsWithId = { ...other_params_data, id: messageData.id };
handleSubmitQuestion(question, paramsWithId);
// Open conversation if applicable
handleOpenConversation();
// Write to log or database
handleWriteToLogOrDatabase();
};
// Helper functions
function addAnswerTextList(answerTexts: string[]): void {
for (let text of answerTexts) {
store.commit('chat/add-answer-text-item', parseAnswerTextContent(text));
}
}
// Ensure this function updates chat record state accordingly
function handleChatRecordUpdate(updatedRecord: ChatRecordData) {
props.chatRecord.updateWith(updatedRecord); // Assuming an update method exists in the chatRecord object
}
function onSubmitQuestion(question: string, otherParamsData: Record<string, any>) {
props.sendMessage(question, otherParamsData, props.chatRecord);
}
function handleOpenConversation() {
props.chatManagement.open(props.chatRecord.id);
}
function handleWriteToLogOrDatabase() {
writeMessageToDatabase(props.chatRecord.id);
}
Explanation of Changes:
- Simplified Logic: Moved the common behavior (
handleChatRecordUpdate
,notifyUser
, etc.) out of conditional blocks into separate helper functions for better readability and reusability. - Encapsulation: Encapsulated specific actions related to opening conversations and writing data into their own methods for ease of maintenance and reuse.
- Assumptions:
- If additional chat record states need updating, it assumes there’s an
updateWith
method on theprops.chatRecord
. - The
writeMessageToDatabase
function is assumed based on how chat interactions are handled elsewhere.
- If additional chat record states need updating, it assumes there’s an
These changes aim to improve modularity, maintainability, and reduce redundancy while ensuring all necessary operations follow logical steps.
fix: The form recall node cannot respond