Skip to content

fix: The form recall node cannot respond #2824

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2025
Merged

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: The form recall node cannot respond

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Apr 8, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Apr 8, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit 9da7a55 into main Apr 8, 2025
4 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@main@fix_workflow branch April 8, 2025 07:50
if (chatRecord) {
chatRecord.open()
}
}
/**
* 等待所有数据输出完毕后 才会关闭流
* @param chatRecordId 对话记录id
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review of Code

@@ -442,6 +442,12 @@ export class ChatManagement {
   chatRecord.write()
 }

+static open(chatRecordId: string) {
+  const chatRecord = this.chatMessageContainer[chatRecordId]
+  if (chatRecord) {
+    chatRecord.open()
+  }
+}
+
/**
 * 等待所有数据输出完毕后 才会关闭流
 * @param chatRecordId 对话记录id

Suggestions:

  • Ensure that this.chatMessageContainer is properly initialized before using it to avoid potential errors when accessing non-existent keys.
  • Add null checks around the chatMessageContainer access and ensure that all methods (write, open) are defined correctly in the ChatRecord interface or type definition to prevent runtime exceptions.

Optimizations

  • Consider moving the initialization of this.chatMessageContainer during the creation of ChatManagement instance instead of relying solely on static accessor properties like chatMessageContainer.

Alternative Initialization:

export class ChatManagement {
  private _chatMessageContainer: Record<string, any> = {}; // Assuming ChatRecord is a generic object

  constructor() {
    this._chatMessageContainer = {};
  }

// Rest of the code remains unchanged.

By making these changes, you can ensure better encapsulation and handle edge cases more gracefully.

@@ -91,6 +90,7 @@ const chatMessage = (question: string, type: 'old' | 'new', other_params_data?:
if (type === 'old') {
add_answer_text_list(props.chatRecord.answer_text_list)
props.sendMessage(question, other_params_data, props.chatRecord)
props.chatManagement.open(props.chatRecord.id)
props.chatManagement.write(props.chatRecord.id)
} else {
props.sendMessage(question, other_params_data)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code appears to be part of a Vue.js component that handles user input and chat management. Here's an analysis with potential suggestions:

Potential Issues:

  1. Duplicate Code: The add_answer_text_list function is called within both branches of the if (type === 'old') condition, which might be unnecessary.
  2. Unnecessary Condition: The else block can be simplified since similar logic applies when type !== 'old'.

Optimization Suggestions:

// Simplified chatMessage method
const chatMessage = async (
  question: string,
  type: 'old' | 'new',
  other_params_data?: Record<string, any>
): Promise<void> => {
  const messageData = await fetchApi('create-message', { question });
  
  // Handle old message type specifically
  if (type === 'old') {
    addAnswerTextList(messageData.answer_texts);
    handleChatRecordUpdate(messageData);
    notifyUser("New Message Added!");
    props.chatManagement.refresh();
  }
  
  // Standard message handling for non-old types
  const paramsWithId = { ...other_params_data, id: messageData.id };
  handleSubmitQuestion(question, paramsWithId);

  // Open conversation if applicable
  handleOpenConversation();

  // Write to log or database
  handleWriteToLogOrDatabase();
};

// Helper functions

function addAnswerTextList(answerTexts: string[]): void {
  for (let text of answerTexts) {
    store.commit('chat/add-answer-text-item', parseAnswerTextContent(text));
  }
}

// Ensure this function updates chat record state accordingly
function handleChatRecordUpdate(updatedRecord: ChatRecordData) {
  props.chatRecord.updateWith(updatedRecord); // Assuming an update method exists in the chatRecord object
}

function onSubmitQuestion(question: string, otherParamsData: Record<string, any>) {
  props.sendMessage(question, otherParamsData, props.chatRecord);
}

function handleOpenConversation() {
  props.chatManagement.open(props.chatRecord.id);
}

function handleWriteToLogOrDatabase() {
  writeMessageToDatabase(props.chatRecord.id);
}

Explanation of Changes:

  • Simplified Logic: Moved the common behavior (handleChatRecordUpdate, notifyUser, etc.) out of conditional blocks into separate helper functions for better readability and reusability.
  • Encapsulation: Encapsulated specific actions related to opening conversations and writing data into their own methods for ease of maintenance and reuse.
  • Assumptions:
    • If additional chat record states need updating, it assumes there’s an updateWith method on the props.chatRecord.
    • The writeMessageToDatabase function is assumed based on how chat interactions are handled elsewhere.

These changes aim to improve modularity, maintainability, and reduce redundancy while ensuring all necessary operations follow logical steps.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant