Skip to content

fix: The local rearrangement model cannot be loaded #2805

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 7, 2025

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: The local rearrangement model cannot be loaded

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Apr 7, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Apr 7, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit 867c539 into main Apr 7, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@main@fix_reranker branch April 7, 2025 03:22
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ class LocalBaseReranker(MaxKBBaseModel, BaseDocumentCompressor):
tokenizer: Any = None
model: Optional[str] = None
cache_dir: Optional[str] = None
model_kwargs: ClassVar = {}
model_kwargs: Any = {}

def __init__(self, model_name, cache_dir=None, **model_kwargs):
super().__init__()
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code has a minor issue with incorrect typing for model_kwargs. It needs to be ClassVar rather than Any, but since they are both used interchangeably here, it doesn't cause runtime errors if you choose Any.

Here's the corrected version of the code:

@@ -72,8 +72,8 @@
         tokenizer: Any = None
         model: Optional[str] = None
         cache_dir: Optional[str] = None
-        model_kwargs: ClassVar = {} # Incorrectly defined as 'ClassVar'
+        model_kwargs: Any = {} 

If you want to ensure strict type checking by specifying dict instead of using Any, change both occurrences to `Dict[str, Any]:

class LocalBaseReranker(BaseKBBaseModel, BaseDocumentCompressor):
    tokenizer: Any = None
    model: Optional[str] = None
    cache_dir: Optional[str] = None
    model_kwargs: Dict[str, Any] = {}  # Corrected to accept only strings as keys

    def __init__(self, model_name, cache_dir=None, **model_kwargs):
        super().__init__()

Suggested Optimization:

  1. Use More Pythonic Defaults: Consider default parameters in the __init__ method where appropriate.
  2. Ensure Type Hint Consistency: Always use specific types (e.g., dict vs any) and avoid unnecessary variance (*args, **kwargs) unless really needed.

These suggestions make your code more readable and consistent, which can help maintainability over time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant