Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: The dialogue prompt is incorrect #2197

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025
Merged

fix: The dialogue prompt is incorrect #2197

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: The dialogue prompt is incorrect

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 10, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@@ -388,6 +388,9 @@ export class ChatRecordManage {
(item) => item.length == 1 && item[0].content == '',
'index'
)
if (set_index <= -1) {
set_index = 0
}
this.chat.answer_text_list[set_index] = [
{
content: answer_text_block,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code has a couple of issues that need to be addressed:

  1. Type Safety Warning: The line this.chat.answer_text_list[set_index] suggests that answer_text_list is expected to hold an array of objects, but using bracket notation with numeric indexes like [set_index] implies it might not always contain arrays at those indices, which can lead to type errors.

  2. Set Index Value Handling: Although you're setting set_index within conditional logic if it's -1, there seems to be no mechanism to ensure the value is reset properly after use or initialization elsewhere in the class method.

  3. Optimization Suggestion: Instead of checking for an empty first element directly within filter(), consider iterating over the length of the filtered result to determine the minimum index, avoiding additional operations on each item checked.

To address these points, here’s an improved version of the function:

export class ChatRecordManage {
  getFirstEmptyAnswerIndex() {
    const filtered = this.chat.answer_text_list.filter(
      (item) => item.length === 0 || (item.length === 1 && item[0].content === '')
    );

    let set_index = Math.min(...filtered.map(item => item.length > 0 ? 0 : 1), Infinity);

    // If still less than 0 due to all items being empty or invalid, default to 0
    if (set_index <= -1) {
      set_index = 0;
    }

    return set_index;
  }
}

// Usage:
const chatRecordManage = new ChatRecordManage();
chatRecordManage.getFirstEmptyAnswerIndex(); // Retrieves the appropriate answer list index

Explanation Changes:

  1. Method Name Change: Added getFirstEmptyAnswerIndex() to encapsulate the logic clearly.
  2. Mapped Minimum Calculation: Used Math.min(......) to calculate the smallest index efficiently.
  3. Conditional Initialization: Ensured even though filtered may contain fewer elements than expected, default_to_0_if_empty remains safe to call without causing out-of-bounds access when accessing the returned array from filtered.

This should resolve the TypeScript type safety concerns, improve readability by centralizing related logic into methods, and potentially enhance performance slightly by eliminating unnecessary map iterations depending on the data structure.

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit 6ecc1c6 into main Feb 10, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@main@fix_chat branch February 10, 2025 03:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant