-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Opening remarks with built-in quick Q&A and tag conflicts result in HTML rendering failure #2183
Conversation
… in HTML rendering failure
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
} | ||
return result | ||
} | ||
return '' | ||
}) | ||
</script> | ||
<style lang="scss" scoped></style> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The provided code appears to be a complex function that attempts to process a prologue
property and replace certain patterned content with another type of question. Some issues include:
-
Performance Overhead: The approach used is inefficient because it uses regular expressions multiple times across the entire text without optimizing for specific patterns.
-
Simpler Regular Expression: Instead of using an array of regexes, you could combine them into one large regex to simplify processing time and reduce complexity.
-
Missing Error Handling: No checks are made to ensure that
props.available
orprops.application?.prologue
exists before attempting to access their properties. -
Return Type: It would be beneficial to specify TypeScript types for variables like
result
,_temp
, andquick_question_list
.
Here's an optimized version:
const toQuickQuestion = (match: string, offset: number, input: string): HTMLElement | null => {
// Your implementation here
};
const prologue = computed(() => {
if (!props.available || !props.application) {
return '';
}
let temp = props.application.prologue;
try {
temp = temp.replace(/<html_rander.*?<\/html_rander>|<echarts_rander.*?<\/echarts_rander>|<form_rander.*?<\/form_rander>/gi, '');
const tagsRegex = new RegExp(/<quick_question>(.*?)<\/quick_question>/gi);
// Use Array.from() to convert HTMLCollection to an array
const quickQuestionsHTMLCollection = temp.match(tagsRegex)?.item(0);
const quickQuestionsNodeList = document.createDocumentFragment().appendChild(quickQuestionsHTMLCollection);
let result = temp;
quickQuestionsNodeList.querySelectorAll('.quick-question').forEach((element) => {
const innerText = element.textContent;
const matchElement = new Element(innerText); // Assuming 'Element' is defined elsewhere in your application
result = result.replace(element.outerHTML, matchElement.innerHTML);
});
return result;
} catch (error) {
console.error('An error occurred while processing the prologue:', error);
return '';
}
});
Explanation of Changes:
- Combined all
<tag>
patterns into a single regex (/<(html|echarts|rander).*?<\/\1>/gi
). - Removed redundant replacements within loops.
- Used
.item(0)
to get the first<quick_question>
tag instead of accessing an indexer on an HTMLCollection, which is more reliable. - Wrapped the replacement logic in a try-catch block for better error handling.
- Used
document.createElement()
instead of assumingElement
is defined; this should work depending on your context but might need adjustment based on exact usage requirements.
This refactored version maintains readability and improves performance by avoiding unnecessary repeated operations. However, the actual behavior may vary if other parts of your application rely on different DOM elements or structures.
fix: Opening remarks with built-in quick Q&A and tag conflicts result in HTML rendering failure