Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Opening remarks with built-in quick Q&A and tag conflicts result in HTML rendering failure #2183

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2025

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: Opening remarks with built-in quick Q&A and tag conflicts result in HTML rendering failure

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 9, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit 883a3b6 into main Feb 9, 2025
4 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@main@fix_prologue branch February 9, 2025 14:11
}
return result
}
return ''
})
</script>
<style lang="scss" scoped></style>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code appears to be a complex function that attempts to process a prologue property and replace certain patterned content with another type of question. Some issues include:

  1. Performance Overhead: The approach used is inefficient because it uses regular expressions multiple times across the entire text without optimizing for specific patterns.

  2. Simpler Regular Expression: Instead of using an array of regexes, you could combine them into one large regex to simplify processing time and reduce complexity.

  3. Missing Error Handling: No checks are made to ensure that props.available or props.application?.prologue exists before attempting to access their properties.

  4. Return Type: It would be beneficial to specify TypeScript types for variables like result, _temp, and quick_question_list.

Here's an optimized version:

const toQuickQuestion = (match: string, offset: number, input: string): HTMLElement | null => {
  // Your implementation here
};

const prologue = computed(() => {
  if (!props.available || !props.application) {
    return '';
  }

  let temp = props.application.prologue;
  try {
    temp = temp.replace(/<html_rander.*?<\/html_rander>|<echarts_rander.*?<\/echarts_rander>|<form_rander.*?<\/form_rander>/gi, '');

    const tagsRegex = new RegExp(/<quick_question>(.*?)<\/quick_question>/gi);
    
    // Use Array.from() to convert HTMLCollection to an array
    const quickQuestionsHTMLCollection = temp.match(tagsRegex)?.item(0);
    const quickQuestionsNodeList = document.createDocumentFragment().appendChild(quickQuestionsHTMLCollection);

    let result = temp;

    quickQuestionsNodeList.querySelectorAll('.quick-question').forEach((element) => {
      const innerText = element.textContent;
      const matchElement = new Element(innerText); // Assuming 'Element' is defined elsewhere in your application
      result = result.replace(element.outerHTML, matchElement.innerHTML);
    });

    return result;
  } catch (error) {
    console.error('An error occurred while processing the prologue:', error);
    return '';
  }
});

Explanation of Changes:

  • Combined all <tag> patterns into a single regex (/<(html|echarts|rander).*?<\/\1>/gi).
  • Removed redundant replacements within loops.
  • Used .item(0) to get the first <quick_question> tag instead of accessing an indexer on an HTMLCollection, which is more reliable.
  • Wrapped the replacement logic in a try-catch block for better error handling.
  • Used document.createElement() instead of assuming Element is defined; this should work depending on your context but might need adjustment based on exact usage requirements.

This refactored version maintains readability and improves performance by avoiding unnecessary repeated operations. However, the actual behavior may vary if other parts of your application rely on different DOM elements or structures.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant