Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Excerpt from the thinking process #2181

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2025
Merged

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: Excerpt from the thinking process

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 9, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit 80a700b into main Feb 9, 2025
4 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@main@fix_thinking branch February 9, 2025 11:51
if not self.reasoning_content_is_end:
self.reasoning_content_is_end = True
self.content += self.all_content
return {'content': self.all_content, 'reasoning_content': ''}
else:
if self.reasoning_content_is_start:
self.reasoning_content_chunk += chunk.content
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are no immediate issues with the provided code snippet. However, there is an unnecessary assignment within the if statement to modify self.reasoning_content_is_end.

I suggest optimizing it by removing that line since it unnecessarily increments the length of self.reasoning_content. Also, ensure that return {'content': '', 'reasoning_content': ''} is correctly placed within a conditional block where it makes sense to handle when both content parts have been fully collected.

Optimized version:

def get_reasoning_content(self, chunk):
    if self.reasoning_content_is_start:
        self.reasoning_content_chunk += chunk.content

    elif not self.reasoning_content_is_complete:
        # Check if we've reached the end tag
        if 'end_of_reaso' in chunk.all_content.strip():  # Adjust condition based on actual tagging
            self.reasoning_content_is_end = True
            self.all_content += chunk.all_content
            return {'content': "", 'reasoning_content': self.reasoning_content_chunk}

    else:  # Both chunks processed
        return {'content': self.all_content, 'reasoning_content': self.reasoning_content_chunk}

In this version, I assume that you meant to include additional logic to check for the end tag (end_of_reaso) and process the concatenated results appropriately. If this isn't the case, please adjust accordingly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant